This is an opportunity to bring dollars and jobs to their state and the only reason they're resistant is to stick with party lines.
155 karma · joined February 23, 2014
This is an opportunity to bring dollars and jobs to their state and the only reason they're resistant is to stick with party lines.
Regardless of which direction you grow, I think give. enough time, the quality of your work will speak for itself.
I've watched too many people try to run the rat race of moving up the later. Staying at a job/role for only 18 months just to hop to the next thing. They lack depth in their area and eventually bottom out completely.
Pennies and Nickels do not fall into that bucket, however.
I've been a part of many outages that originated on our cloud provider. And what I've learned is the best practices rarely save you. We pretend multi-az, global DBs and fail overs protect us, but they don't. They make us more scale able, but not more resilient.
I spent a lot of time trying to think about how we arrived here. where I work there are a lot of Senior Directors and SVPs who used to write code 10+ years ago. Who if you would ask them to build a little hack project they would have no idea where to start. And AI has given them back something they've lost because they can build something simple super quickly. But they fail to see that just because it accelerates their hack project, it won't accelerate someone who's an expert. i.e. AI might help a hobbyist plant a garden, but it wouldn't help a farmer squeeze out more yield.
It has taken me a decade to realize this is the key to success. Just do your very best work, as often as possible, and let the rest figure itself out.
I accidentally created a data warehouse that became the necessary backbone to launch a massive new org (100M+ revenue). I was building it for a relatively small near realtime Elasticsearch cluster to generate data reports for an application. But I thought, gee, if I suck in a bunch of other data from other sources and clean it, I might find a use some day. Little did I know that someone else would piggy back on it to build a POC for a giant business expansion.
Lots of knowledge working and call center opportunities are moving to full time remote. Paying employees the same with better benefits to never leave their house.
This would be an issue if it were mutable data.
Basically when 2.0 landed, routable components couldn't be worked on until glimmer components were completed. Angle brackets, Improved Pods, etc, same.
So even if it wasn't under dev that whole time, it held back other features that would have really improved Ember.
Ember is a good framework with a lot of potential, but more than anything it needs a good PM. Ember devs just spent nearly 14 months rewriting the layout engine (Glimmer 2.0) that they had spent the prior 8 months writing (Glimmer). And what do they have to show for it? A 100ms or so speed boost on complex views. Instead they should focus on fixing up the crufty parts of their API and adding feature they've been promising users for years. Instead Tom Dale has been off writing FastBoot, an even more niche component of Ember that very few apps will even use.
React and Angular are far from perfect, but one upside is they have parent companies to help keep them focused.
That said, I've long thought if you stop treating people like animals, they'll stop acting like it. I've never studied prisons, or psychology, or anything remotely related. But I genuinely believe this philosophy is investigating.
And also, part of my concern that wasn't well pointed out, was in some cases those previous companies may not even exist. You couldn't even "point to the company" and say I worked there, on that.