399 karma · joined August 8, 2011
Very interesting and highly reccomended
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Estaci%C3%B3n_SetDomingue...
It's been really weird to see everyone's reaction to this thing. Surreal almost. Didn't see Notch get this kind of hate when he shared his bonus with all employees. Perhaps it's because he works in the financial industry?
Not sure the solve for this, just found it interesting.
Also if you are referring to the proplem of private prisons I do agree it's probably not a good thing but since less than 1/5 of prisons are privately run I don't think it is the main cause of the problem.
Anyone see what the issue is? Been staring for 20 minutes . . .
I'm certain this is just the proficiency of people who happened to take their test and therefore is completely meaningless.
was 5 minutes walk to nearest grocery and 5 minutes bike to work. Though in the winter I would walk (half hour) because biking on ice is deadly.
$2-3 / day for food is doable (Cali groceries are a bit more expensive so maybe $4 here). Cut out all but the cheap meats. bread and veggies are super cheap (corn can be 5/$1 when it is in season)
no insurance. no internet (libraries are great). no car.
I never had expenses above $1000/month (not counting the month I paid $1000 to buy my first car) until I moved to the bay area and started making six figures.
after rent, having no car (bicycle) and no data plan cut things down even more.
only real issue is lack of medical insurance.
What I mean is that it seems the companies 'bid' on anyone who met some minimum requirement and relied on the initial phone screen to actually vet the candidate. The three phone screens I had the person on the other end displayed no knowledge of the experience and skills I listed on my profile and one did not even have any preference what division of the company I should work for (was just looking for another somewhat competent software engineer, not caring much beyond that)
My point is: personalized messages are more likely to result in a hire BECAUSE the person writing the message knows what they are looking for. Conversely the recruiters I deal with on a regular basis are only looking for a 'python engineer' or something similar. They could not possibly write a personalized recruiting message.
Making laws to make the neighbors feel safer! Fantastic! "Don't be poor around me, I don't feel safe."
This is one of the worst forms of NIMBYism. And treating the disadvantaged as dangerous is a form of prejudice. How unfortunate that people only seem to care about racial prejudice.
tencent is the corporate conglomerate and owns QQ, weibo, wechat and others.
QQ has been around for a bit and would be analogous to yahoo (social network, chat, news, email). QQ.com reflects this.
wechat is the new product they are trying to push to the global market.
When I work remote using my laptop I always end with a headache and often tired eyes as well.
Many many hackers at my office use 3 column tmux or screen terminal sessions all day long on 11 in laptop screens, but monitors are cheap so why strain your eyes?
As others have mentioned check on ambient lighting and brightness settings. You may also want to try setting your white balance, contrast and saturation levels. Factory defaults are for making them look good in on display in a store, not for daily use.
For example in my hometown it is still possible to rent a flat with a friend for less than $400/month meaning single people can survive on very little
The Hispanic immigrants are more likely from a lower class an much more likely to have arrived on something like a family visa with no higher education at all.
The biggest problem with the us economy currently is the erosion of middle class jobs for unskilled and semi-skilled labor. My grandparents lived comfortably on union jobs. Most of those jobs are gone now, and those that exist are paying less all the time. I know a man who is 60 working in a lumber mill making less then he ever has in his life (40+ years of factory work).
Yes sure consumption has increased with affluence but Many people don't realize how hard it is for an unskilled and unconnected person to find any kind of work. I know some Iraqi refugees who could not even get agriculture work because the Hispanic population always filled any open jobs through network effects.
The only jobs that exist for unskilled labor are service sector, fast food &tc. These may pay enough to survive in many places but it will not be comfortable or secure.
Second biggest problem is the rising cost of healthcare. 15% of GDP and growing, more than half of that is government paid (medicare / medicaid / etc). My father is self-employed so purchases his own healthcare, but there is no out-of-pocket maximum for him so when my mother was diagnosed with cancer there was a massive financial cost despite 80% being paid by the insurance company.
There are other problems as well, but those are the biggest cause of financial insecurity and lower lifestyle quality among the bottom quintile of US citizens.
Edit:
Fewer hippies after I had composed my rant. Re: rents. yeah they are bad but really only outrageous on the coasts. So depending on your location the rent can kill you, but in my hometown it was never a big deal.
No, ease-of-use and beauty are different things, though often conflated in rants.
I've never used any of those sites so I cannot speak to that aspect, but as far as beauty is concerned in a lot of the examples the ruby site looks more trendy, possibly because they are newer, because python has been around for a bit longer?
Site-wide redesigns are rare for content-focused technical sites, especially volunteer-based open-source projects.
thinking this way: in the mind of the consumer tasty-ohs are not cheerios, though they are a replacement, but a seat on Southwest is the same thing as a seat on Delta. some people care, most don't. Airlines have not been able to successfully differentiate their products, so they operate in a commodity market, same as petrol or supermarkets.
http://jisaacstone.blogspot.com/2012/12/how-to-get-job-in-2-...
Some points of differentiation:
I did not finish any projects in any sort of demoable state
I did not build a network
I didn't really have a plan
The most important bit is this:
> Learn relentlessly and without excuses
There are enough people hiring that you really only need to demonstrate basic competency and apply for every jr or entry level position you find. Eventually you'll find a place where someone is actually looking for ability.
Tech is as close to merit-based hiring as you'll find outside of actual trades.
Democracy is good because (if well designed) it protects the rights of the minority as well as the majority. But a dictatorship can use resources much more efficiently to accomplish it's goals.
Since programmers can easily switch frameworks it is better to have each guided by a strong and idealistic central leader.
I'm thinking about PHP vs Python
I think learning java made me better ad designing classes (I never explicitly used a singleton in python before) and helped a bit in my thinking about concurrency.
For python or ruby try to follow the common idioms rather than programming in a familiar style. I'd recommend avoiding classes altogether at first, trying to get as much done with the built-in data structures and functional aspects of the languages.
For me the thing I miss most in java is the interactive interpreter. I usually develop with an ipython instance open so I can test out different ideas and explore the features of a new package quickly. I believe that is why scripting languages are favored by hackers and startups.
guardian link: http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/nov/15/china-one-child...
I was 'good at math' but 'bad at spelling' and that was normal and natural. Except I found out it is just as much a lie as the opposite thought the author had.
http://www.weirdasianews.com/2009/11/21/hong-kong-citizens-l...
Which is not a good way to live, but much much better than riding a bus.
Zoning and fire codes and whatnot means this may be illegal here. But really I think people here are more comfortable with homelessness than allowing uncomfortably affordable housing to be built.