439 karma · joined July 1, 2020
contact: hi at jinay dot dev
It's a helpful analogy to understand the contrast between today's gradient descent vs open-ended exploration.
[1] First half of https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T08wc4xD3KA
More notes from my deep dive: https://x.com/jinaycodes/status/1932078206166749392
I'd love to see how far I can take this by giving it to an LLM and asking it to format for me with Quarkdown.
Built one for myself. It's context-aware and promptable.
Tested well on Linux, not so much on other platforms but in theory should support them.
It's a bit meta but I wrote it mostly using Claude Code. Once I had an MVP, I was able to prompt much faster by just speaking out what I wanted it to change.
In fact, I wrote all this out using a dictation tool in ~20 seconds (258 WPM).
Search "io" on Google right now and see what comes up...
Years later, I get an email from a stranger in Korea, asking me how to run my program. Why would he want to use my silly program? Turns out you can adapt the code to read analog pressure gauges which is really useful for chemical plants. Goes to show that there's often a use for most things.