64 karma · joined March 10, 2014
No, on windows you still have to run a Linux vm which the containers will run inside. Meaning all containers actually run on a Linux host. The new Docker for Windows app only abstract away some stuff so it feels easier working with.
> does it work the other way around
No
If you're not really looking I'd tailor it for whatever job I'd really really want. You never know, but even if that dream job isn't available a CV like that will emphazise what you're truly passionate about. It might lead to something great
2 Gaming Rigs, 1 Tower - Virtualized Gaming Build Log https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LuJYMCbIbPk
7 Gamers 1 CPU is back! But does it ACTUALLY work!? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=opX-AsJ5Uy8
edit: just kidding - I'd probably download a parking lot worth of cars
"Adobe adds algorithms to Photoshop that prevent users from opening or printing scanned money. While we've been aware of this feature for quite a while" Posted by Craig Swanson on May 14, 2006 07:03 PM http://www.creativetechs.com/iq/how_to_use_scanned_money_in_...
edit: seems to be more info here, from 2004. Latest Photoshop version contains anti-counterfeit measures http://www.geek.com/news/latest-photoshop-version-contains-a...
http://s12.postimg.org/xth7k6fi5/Screenshot_from_2015_02_01_...
I might be a strange case, but I just have this feeling "real" companies spend their $$$ on meetings in Bahamas and Ferraris, while FOSS/OSS would be more open to security audits/etc.
A company with money on the line can (also) easily be shut down or aquired. I imagine a FOSS/OSS team would be demanding more guarantees for the future of the project, while "in it for the money" companies would take the check and not give a damn if it was shut down the same day.
"Real" companies often seem to push releases/features (prematurely?) to attract new customers. That the new features pass review/QA doesn't necessarily mean they are implemented right (goto fail?). In addition FOSS/OSS have public bug trackers, I'd rather know there are x number of bugs labeled "security" in my os, than not beeing told at all.
Support can (should?) be where open source make money, there are lots of FOSS/OSS projects out there offering paid support/installations/sass.
And the unknown collection of open source developers _may_ be a much better collection of security specialists/coders than in the "real" company. As most of FOSS/OSS is done voluntarily you don't have to pay huge paychecks for top of the line expertise.
Bottom line, I trust Debian (& co) and Mozilla. I don't trust Microsoft, Apple and Google.
This is 100% biased as to what I think. I understand that this is a two sided issue, and fully understand people who think like you sketched out. I'm just not one of those people :P
Are they totally wrong, do they have some kind of special implementation that requires lots of ram not to fail, or are you just not worried about it?
ref: http://doc.freenas.org/index.php/Hardware_Recommendations
I have one at my workstation at home and one at work, and never have to find the cable to charge my phone. Which also mean I'll never wear out the charging socket :)
First of all it doesn't help they are in their infant stage (meaning: they suck), I also don't feel the huge need to be even more connected than I am today.
In fact I am doing the opposite. I'm trying to leave my phone more often as it takes away my attention at times when I should give attention to other things / people.
I find it's kinda rude when I'm at a dinner or meeting and people sit there watching their own little screen instead of actually beeing part of what's going on in the real world.
I'm guessing another screen won't make it any better.
Me? Passion. I work from 7 to 15 and code on hobby projects / play with new languages/frameworks almost daily after that.