jhoechtl

A delicate topic with many perspectives. Our small families make it possible to devote so much energy to our kids. However autonomy is all so important to become a strong adult later. We deliberately need let go more than we do now.

As you mention Lafarge. I think his fallacy and other theorists of its time and school of thinking was mankinds natural sense of enough os enough.

Lafarge wont come true with the quite large inequality of wealth and mankinds appetite for disteactions and general fear of silence and deep contemplation.

In the case of Europe much of generated wealth is wandering abroud (China: goods, US: digital services) so wealth doesn't get enough redistributed but is created somewhere else.

> OpenOffice and LibreOffice already feel irrelevant and dated to begin with.

It is the only non cloud free office solution which is truely free. How can this be irrelevant?

That the elite is poisoning the masses.

Ny that time office will be cloud only.

The dispora means little though, the people in the country count as they live 365 days there without the convenient ability to comment from a distance and they are ones who would have to die for a turnover.

Last commit is from 2 years

Space - no. Moon - yes

Space is cold but has little mass. Either heat can radiated or transfered. To transfer heat, mass which easily absorbs heat is required. The moon might be suitable for that.

So do your marh then in the roman system and have fun with it.

Enjoy the warmth!

I think it was Reagan turning all backwards orientated

With sixel support finally comming to terminals

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sixel

we are full circle, 40 year later.

But that wouldn't be cool

I think JSON Schema made the same fallacy as eg. OWL did: The assumption of an open world. 99% percent of the time you want to express "This message should look like this and everything else is wrong". Instead JSON-S went the way to make everything possible at the price of rendering the default unwieldy.

Is Julia a general purpose programming language? I mean I did check the web site which contains a "General Purpose" section, yet the articles seem to center around "scientific applications".

Wut? Oh boy https://www.felixcloutier.com/x86/gf2p8affineqb

snow is acting as a mirror. Won't have the effect on green gras.

I guess the Rust workforce is tiny, opinionated and mentally demanding.

Time for the disposable vape web farm

Emacs with databases without org would be interessing. I now there is sql-mode which supposedly works to connect with an inferior process but a tuorial about that would be nice

Thatcherism all the way down.

> It is likely the hardware effiency of their chips. Apple SoCs running industry-standard benchmarks still run very cool, yet still show dominant performance

Dieselgate?

Using it - better: used it. It's outdated, doesn't understand key words of recent D2 - versions and doesn't integrate well with emacs, i.e. default key bindings are IMHO not very emacsish.

Checking if you are sharing torrents, run a tor node, mine coins?

Uh yeah, my mistake

That makes a very intersting read and adds the necessary context to the previous comment how that plan can actually be legally sold.

> It sounds like Airbus’s bet on the future paid of

Well they did bet on the Dreamliner, fell on their nose and still recovered.

For some your comment might sound even comic but it is damn true. It safens me that the dangerous spiral is not seen by many others.

After all, the milenia old adage "bread and games" silences to many.

I have on gripe, that is the mixture between org structure and org document heradings. I know, they are the same, and such a distinction doesn't exist.

You can start a "document" at any place in the org hierachy. I would rather prefer a distintion between these two concepts.

What makes a modern Lisp? I am aware of Fennel and Jannet. Anyone havng experience with one of those or another one I am not aware of?

Aufstand, Unterstand, Verstand, Umstand.

In german we have some of those -stand words.