166 karma · joined July 30, 2011
Curious why that isn't mentioned in the article as a contributing factor.
And how do they keep them fixed in the right position?
He's an enthusiastic, misguided, bureacratic cog.
"This is a natural fit for the US, where the business of healthcare happens much closer to (and often involves) the end consumer."
Seems true, but would add that it could go a whole lot closer. The typical consumer is generally insulated by insurance being packaged into employment deals and a near universal culture of prepay masquerading as 'insurance.'
e.g. Homakov's hack of github didn't deserve jail time as it was for publicity, not malevolance.
Also the incredible focus on these two events, considering all the other turmoil in the financial markets, has always struck me as a clear case of scapegoating with Luddite underpinnings. Pretty soon, we will all believe that the recession was caused by HFT's.
The negativity seems to be a result of previous bias.
Doing good, but misrepresenting the 'big issues' is not helpful. Too often good intentions substitute for good work.
One should care about the race or gender of someone, the goal should be to attract the most talent. Also, saying 'everyone can learn' may give a warm fuzzy feeling and make people think you are a good person, but it is most likely not true.
Pushing a round peg into a square hole is destructive both for the peg and the hole.