593 karma · joined January 31, 2011
FWIW, these ideas are not dead. For example, Erlang on Xen uses a modified 9P2000 for much of what it does: http://erlangonxen.org/more/9p2000e
Not really. If it happens once, it can / will happen again. In my opinion a bug is a bug and should be fixed. But I do agree this attitude does seem prevalent.
It's not that HTTP APIs aren't useful - of course they are - it's the religious adherence to REST doctrine that is harmful. I take the author's point to basically be, "do the simplest thing that makes sense for your use case, don't worry about how RESTful it is", which I totally agree with.
Have any experienced Emacs users found that Atom makes them more productive in any dimension? I want to like it but I can't see the light at the end of the tunnel.
Personally, I actually quite like the idea of C as an IR.
For others curious how long it took: judging from the first commit on GitHub (https://github.com/nineties/amber/commit/bdb49d27968d6bc4588...), which references a first commit from 2009, it seems at least 6 years.
The question was "which one looks cleaner?", not "which one makes it easier to find information?", and to my eye the one on the right has more noise (the balance of spacing, border around the image, more varied fonts). I guess there are arguments for both or neither, but it's clearly not cut and dry.
I'd love to see a poll of the HN community to see the distribution of support, amongst what should be a relatively knowledgable group of people. Unfortunately I don't have enough karma to create it myself.