jfghi

Even worse, attempts to even discuss the issue get aggressively hushed.

And enough time to get some training in although cardio is slow to develop

For me at least, I’d say the prior versions of windows were pretty zippy whereas now I don’t even know what’s going on behind the scenes and why it takes so long to perform basic tasks, even with 16 gb ram.

The shareholders have proclaimed that such a strategy is illegal due to fiduciary duty /s

I remember some really nice macro usage.

Why not? They have access to credit data and are able to adjust pricing close to what is affordable. Much of the rental market is consolidated by 10-figure firms running similar sets of algorithms.

Also a subsidy to landlords that would simply raise rent by the forgiveness amounts.

Exactly, it’s a gig-career injected with a high level of entitlement and disdain for customer.

I thought mergers increased efficiency to better serve the customer. /s

The chef profession has officially been replaced adding 19b to the economy. /s

To me this reads as an off topic whataboutism. Perhaps [0] and [1] deserve their own articles, but neither detract from the overall point of what the tweet is saying and provide any demonstration as to why crypto platforms should continue breaking the law.

Not just one

Even if this was feasible, how much would it cost and how long would it take to successfully roll out?

There is a strong bias against scams in general, let alone multi-billion dollar scams.

Off-topic comparison.

1. Apple is heavily scrutinized.

2. Airplanes have high standards for design and manufacturing as errors have serious consequences. Boeing has recent failures and deserves to be under a microscope.

War on illegal activity

I prefer those banks over the current crop of initial-named “CEOs”

Just needs a “good faith constructive” conversation with regulators. /s

Same way that meta “values your privacy”

Perhaps, but I think that the definition of bourgeois lifestyle has expanded to include those who simply have 2 children, rent a sfh and perhaps retire at some point.

It is, but I think that it would lead to a lot of false positives for automated plagiarism detection.

Ironically, the best detector for plagiarism would be a 15 minute conversation asking the student about their research and opinions on the topics written, kind of like interviewing someone who claims redis expertise on their resume.

To me it seems like academic papers force people to back up every statement with a quote and agree with assigned readings. This style of writing leads to unoriginal results.

Perhaps there could be multiple plants for different types of components with redundancy. The air defense has been remarkably good.

Similarly, the existing tech was better.

Would you like to compare levels of understanding?

Not sure as I’m not yet familiar enough with the types of errors occurring. I do think a somewhat more accurate and possibly technical set of terms would be more useful for discussions about it though than hallucination.

Rant, I think the usage of the term hallucination in this context is entirely too anthropomorphic.

If these criminals are caught for thefts, should the wealthier jurisdictions also pay for their justice via taxes?

I think one taboo topic is having positive things to say about projects using the C programming language. Immediately it’ll get hit with criticisms from rust promoters even if it’s a domain that rust is quite separate from.