17 karma · joined June 3, 2018
Often the problem is misrepresented as "streaming vs. physical media", wrongly implying that streaming is the only means of purely digital distribution. However, it is actually a question of whether you actually own media vs. only renting them.
I have a similar gripe with iMacs and most all-in-one PCs that they cannot be used as a monitor for other devices. Once the PC/Mac inside becomes obsolete, the whole device becomes useless even though it has an excellent display that still works.
This is kind of the keyboard equivalent of this.
Determining what the legal moves in a state are, and what state results from a given move, is not something the AI would learn by itself, but is programmed into the system by a human expert.
No. Syncthing is not a great backup application because all changes to your files (modifications, deletions, etc.) will be propagated to all your devices. You can enable versioning, but we encourage you to use other tools to keep your data safe from your (or our) mistakes."
https://docs.syncthing.net/users/faq.html#is-syncthing-my-id...
I get that it is supposed to be a joke, but it kind of falls flat because it misses the point entirely.
Wouldn't it suffice to just have them in a different, private branch? The public stuff would be in the main branch pushed to the public repo, the private stuff would remain local in the private branch?
It's somewhat similar to some all-in-one PCs where I think they don't look too bad, if only they came with a video input port so that you can use it as a display for other devices, or simply as a monitor should the PC part become obsolete some day.
From what I can gather, this is however not a built-in feature of the Pi 400 and will probably require some tinkering (which might be an interesting project in and of itself).
I also understand that the Raspberry Pi Foundation's goal is to offer this product at a certain price point, and that even though many of the wishes for additional features you can read in the comments here and elsewhere are each not unreasonable by themselves, every part that is added comes at an additional cost, and that they usually decide against it if it's something that is only used by a small fraction of the user base.
One feature that I still do miss is to organize or browse my collection on the app by a self-defined folder structure. Most apps offer to sort by artist, album titles, genres etc., but I do not find this sufficient or convenient, especially if your collection is very heterogenous.
For example, I have my pop albums sorted by artist, but my classical music by composer (rather than artists/performer). I also have a large collection of singles which I prefer to have in a separate folder (to not clutter the pop artist directory too much), sorted chronologically. Similarly, I keep compilations in a separate folder, and do not want every artist of a single song in a compilation appear in my overall list, or have all compilations lumped under "Various Artists".
As far as I can see, Decoupled already maintains the files in the user-given folder structure, and technically I can just click on "Files" and then browse through it. Would it be possible however to place this option more prominently on the main screen that is visible when the app opens up? Or even make the options on the main screen user-configurable, similar to how the iOS music player allows enabling and disabling the "Artist", "Genre" etc. entries in the media library?