jeltz

No, it doesn't. You still see the domain name in the TLS headers.

Same with Facebook. It is extremely hard to follow events published on Instagram or Facebook.

I mean that is how it works in all legal systems. If you refuse to pay your assets will be seized. Which is why they would almost certainly not refuse.

Why wouldn't they be able to collect? As long as Amazon does business in a country the legal system in that country can collect.

Yeah, the scandal is about different members being held to different standards. Why are Azerbaijan and Israel allowed to stay while Russia got kicked out? Especially since Azerbaijan and Israel both have manipulated the voting in addition to waging wars.

Having health with VATMOSS too my experience is that it was trivial to implement. Maybe your country fucked up the rollout? Here in Sweden I had zero issues.

> Are people saying that there's an ideology of pushing rust for things without concern for quality?

Yes, there is. There are people who genuinely think quality does not matter as log as it is written in Rust as Rust is memory safe.

My solution was to stop using Ubuntu and move to Debian.

LLMs for sure need those things. maybe not the same abstractions as humans do but without understabdable code an LLM will just fail to accomplish the task you ask it to do.

Not sure what you mean as system design conversations because while in theory those can be good in practice the ones I have been at had been techbro wankery where the interviewer had a particular answer in mind. Like designing your own memcached clone for example is a terrible task for systems design.

Not sure what I can say but the LLMs simply do not write good code without tons of handholding. As a C developer most LLMed patches I have seen the last couple of months have been awful and the few good ones I know from the author themselves that they did a ton of iteration and/or manual cleanup. Maybe they are less bad at writing other languages.

LLMs produce pretty crappy code but they are very useful tools for protyping, code search and finding bugs. Maybe LLMs in the future will be able to write good code but they are very far from that right now.

That is not the same topic. LLMs are useful tools, and that is despite them producing fucking awful code.

Not really, I do not buy that. Ukrainian intelligence can sabotage train tracks deep within Belarus and Russia. And given how convient it would be to blame Russia here I wonder why they do not.

What implications? Why wouldn't they want an, in this case real, external enemy they could use to distract the people from their own failures?

Quite likely but I still doubt anyone will involve the police despite crimes very likely having been committed.

Many, maybe even most, online casinos target women primarily.

This is very dependent on jurisdiction and type of company.

Matt was here on HN writing strange comments and undermining his own legal case despite people telling him to stop underming himself. That self destructive behavior is why people started to think he was having a mental health crisis.

And you seem to know way too much about this to be "not involved at all in WP".

They are not necessarily untreatable but to be treatable they need to realize and admit they have an issue, which is unlikely and gets even less likely if they are financially successful.

So do you have any comment on the article or are you just here to promote Automattic?

Yeah, but I am doubtful that the board wants to involve the police.

I would rather listen to someone with current merits than someone who has not produced anything notable in years. Especially if the topic is current trends in software development.

But as he has little to show the last decades we have very little reason to listen to him over some random blogger.

I eat whole cherries, I am too lazy to spit out the pits do I swallow them whole. So far it has not been any issue at all and I eat a lot of cherries.

Maybe the marketing pitch, like many other pitches, was a lie?

In Rust variables are not destroyed after the last borrow ends but instead when it goes out of scope. I guess that is why it us called borrow checking.

To me that is not a credit thing because this removes a piece evidence for the ability of AI to come up with novel ideas while still making it a useful tool.

The agents still write bad code unless my colleagues and the people who submit PRs to the repos I am responsible for somehow use agents from last year.

And, no, it is not a question about style or preferences, the code is messy and contains to me as a maintainer obvious bugs.

Actually rich people think they re helping more than that. If we assume the average length of a recurring donation is 6 months they feel they help 8 dollars for every 2 they donate.

But otherwise you are right, this is done because it makes everyone donating feel like a winner other than few cynics like me. :D But that said I do not mind these drives.