jeffvroom

I think my lack of clear presentation has you confused. Yes, neutrinos pass through us all the time but scientists are not saying dark matter is inside atoms, in the boundaries between things, mediating actions at every boundary layer in subtle ways.

It sounds to me like you are saying I couldn't possibly have found a simple solution for all of these unknown problems? How could it be that easy? It is actually that easy, but when you're used to unknowns and complexity, it's terrifying to imagine how amazing it will feel after such a revelation.

How about you give it time, give me time to make the picture clearer? I just took out all of the spirit stuff and uploaded new slides I spent all day working on for the science intro to try and make it clearer. Once that's done I'll redo the video, maybe after work some day this week.

So far no one one here has actually refuted any of my arguments in a way that tells me anything over than I tried to say too much too soon. It smells bad, disrespects science, or whatever. I never claimed to be a scientist, only to have made a discovery.

I did learn I need to make more diagrams and honestly it's really helped me so I am glad I did post today. And again, I apologize for interrupting your weekend but hope this eventually pays off for all of us.

Yes, most of this was cleaned up by Claude absolutely. I'm not getting paid. I have a busy day job right? Why would I subject my readers to my crappy prose when I can clean it up. Why wouldn't I use Claude for research, then followup and double-check conclusions, new chats, different lines of questioning. I am totally sympathetic to the fact that I messed up big time in framing this for this audience. I'll get it fixed but please have an opened mind. I'm not wrong about this and you're not wrong to give it a pass. Sorry for the noise on a Sunday but again, I appreciate the feedback cause it is making the story better.

I really appreciate your thoughtful response. I'm already improving the content based on this feedback so it's super helpful. I'm a computer programmer, not a scientist and admittedly am not good at getting my point across clearly. But I do know how to model complex systems. Scientists are saying there's no dark matter on earth right? None in atoms? But if was in both places, couldn't different pressure zones in that fluid, i.e. different gravity fields affect atomic clocks in the same way as predicted by Einstein? Same fluid dynamics equations right? Does warped space time make more sense to you? How do we measure the speed of light? Isn't it in the same fluid conditions? I must really suck if 6-8 dimensions of weirdness make more sense :) This is a really challenging situation for me but again, I'm grateful to see how it breaks down in how I'm presenting it.

I do believe I'm right about this :) I've had a few weeks now to understand how this does explains the world better. That said, I've always had a hard time getting people to understand me so I hope at least someone can look past that and see how important this discovery is for the world. I appreciate your feedback. I have my work cut out for me here!

Can you say more about what you mean? We always see light moving through specific dark matter fluid flow patterns. How could you tell the difference? Do you have an explanation for how Maisie's galaxy is redshifted so far away from what should be it's real age? Couldn't it be because we're seeing it through a faster moving stream of dark matter fluid? Is there an experiment I missed that would prove this theory wrong?

Thanks, I appreciate the feedback. It's not an easy message to convey or understand that's for sure. I'll take this feedback and try to improve on how this comes across. But how do you think all of the dark matter got removed from space after the big bang? Just because the math works, does warped space time and all that really make more sense? A fluid universe works with the same math, the same equations. Once you see that angular momentum from dark orbital systems have subtle effects at the boundary layers, it changes how things work. Hopefully I can find a way to show other people.

Thanks for that feedback. I should probably ease into that content with more context. What did you think of the Science Guide? That's a more graceful introduction. I'm a 60 yr old programmer that has studied science for decades and am sure that physics missed something big so I hope you take another look.

Fifteen years ago I had numbness in my fingers from lots of hacking. I ended up talking to the dr who invented the "pilosplint": http://www.painreliever.com/IMAK_IMAKPilo.html who suggested the problem may be in how my wrists are positioned when I sleep. You need 6 hours a day in a neutral "at rest" position for swelling to subside. I was often sleeping with my hands curled up. Eventually, I retrained myself to sleep with my hands in a more relaxed position and all symptoms have gone away.