668 karma · joined January 8, 2011
I love Minecraft. I hope Notch does something to stop this. I'd love to see Minecraft on the Xbox, but not if it means stealing someone else's idea.
Just a suggestion.
Its sad to see that an informed, but non-conforming opinion is taken as fact and karma-nuked.
I wonder if this has anything to do with: http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2247962
I know I plan to comment my python code a little differently now! Maybe that will help balance the numbers?
I know I'd be pretty vulgar if I programmed in C++/Javascript all day!
Frankly, I think you'd be more than fine if you let it be on a first come, first served basis, with the added caveat of garnering a little market research. That way you're not turning away too many people.
You run the risk of taking on a lot of work if you start filtering everyone. And if you do that, you may miss out on a potential market you hadn't identified previously. Just a thought :)
Once things are stable, start scaling the beta up to a reasonable number of users. I.e., stress test, in increments. Once you meet a pre-set milestone, set it loose.
Goodluck!
"Get 20 fax fages free"
Otherwise, cool idea.
We're still pretty locked into 2.6. I'd love to move to 3.2 but it would break EVERYTHING!!!!(! added for emphasis!)
Maybe in ~10 years, everyone will be using 3.2, I know I can't wait! :D
I get so busy doing so many things that I often don't develop for months at a time. This used to be a problem when I used C. With Python its a non-issue.
I read your FAQ and such. I found that, for a 'security' product, it was light on the security details. Mentioning encryption once and not much else. Expanding on that might put a few people at ease.
You may also want to include a comparison/benefits sheet in contract to existing solutions(like the one I mention). People are going to be reluctant to hand over their login credentials if you can't quell those fears.
Otherwise, best of luck!
Edit: I hope the above doesn't come across as an attack, so much as a serious of unsolicited suggestions :)
Enjoy! I know we'll be using this soon.
Port 38378, 1292, 65000, in quick succession. IMPOSSIBLE a port scan will ever hit those ports in that order.
Have that sequence trigger a modification to your iptables or execute some script to modify sshd_config or whatever else. It works wonders and is another level of security.
In conjunction with the following, I've had virtually no issues:
Port 22222 #Easy to remember, rarely hit. Even if it does get hit, it takes them a little longer to scan up to this range. Move it higher if you want.
Protocol 2 #NO EXCEPTIONS!
LoginGraceTime: 60 #seconds. If you need more than 60 seconds, you're probably doing it wrong. Change to 30 if your host is fast.
PermitRootLogin No #self explanatory. No means no.
AllowUsers jefe78 otherguy #this should help if you use obscure user names
Now, combine that with denyhosts http://centoshelp.org/security/denyhosts/ and some really strict configs and you should be better off than you were.
What was your take on the learning curve?
Clicked on "another random clue" after reading the first one. That disappeared on the following clues.
Having to use Twitter/any other common ID is going to cause people to shy away. Let me register for my own ID on your site.
Otherwise, I love the idea!
I was an avid FF user for many years. I shied away from Chrome for quite some time, until this December. A fresh FF install with no addons was painfully unresponsive, given 'too many tabs'. Those same tabs in Chrome chugged along.
I hope FF can get back on track(relative to Chrome:P) and reduce some of the bloat.
Keep at it! I hope you keep enjoying it.