5,205 karma · joined February 8, 2008
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pentachromacy#Animals_that_are...
https://github.com/be5invis/Iosevka/tree/master/glyphs
http://money.cnn.com/2014/08/11/technology/uber-fake-ride-re...
http://www.businessinsider.com/ubers-operation-slog-against-...
http://danluu.com/google-sre-book/#chapter-4-service-level-o...
I'd expect logic at that level might be more difficult to train for than the relatively low-level visual task of identifying and following tracks. But I guess existing self-driving systems already need to work at that level to predict the actions of other cars and pedestrians, so presumably the current data-driven training techniques would also handle it OK? (Assuming a lack of pranksters with shovels...)
Also, merging path elements together helps.
For example, here's the logo in 1952 bytes: http://pastebin.com/YYBpWsDE
And I'm sure there's further room for manual reduction, maybe by switching between strokes/fills and further cleaning up the paths.
(It would be cool if someone were to work on an automated system for doing this kind of simplification. But I have a feeling that it's difficult find a general technique that will work across SVG hierarchies, like scaled/rotated groups, etc.)
I noticed that the "top ten cause" chart doesn't have an "other" column, but it looks like that can be computed from the total rates for top ten causes and the total for all causes. If my math is correct, we went from 191.3 (2014) to 191.1 (2015). So I guess the good news is the death rate from unpopular or unexplained causes went down a little. :|
The Chesterton's Fence story has always bothered me. The moral puts all blame on the person challenging the fence for not coming to the same conclusions as the builder.
For the person building the fence, it's easy to assume that the purpose of your work is self-evident, but the truth is that it is hard for anyone else to put together the facts as you saw them, and it's harder still to reason the same way you did. So just thinking really hard about the reasons for the fence's existence will not necessarily lead to a correct -- or even desirable -- result. The story's moral may as well have been: "What I did is more important than what you want to do." Or: "Fear change."
I'd rather see a dual lesson drawn from the same story: "If what you are doing is important, it's just as important to make it clear why it is important."
This particularly applies in the context of software development, when a little effort to make the rationale of some code more clear can pay off over the dozens to hundreds of times the code must be read and rejustified.
I'm certain that inadequate blood flow is a major contributor to RSI, and that's probably one reason that exercise seems to help so much. Unfortunately, I think, environmental temperature is often overlooked as a source, maybe because it can affect individuals in so many different ways (e.g. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hunting_reaction).
Whether they take contributions or not is not really relevant to open-sourceness -- under an appropriate license anyone can use the source to run their own project with whatever contribution policy they like -- but it looks like the main distributor is indeed open to contributions:
(Alias for https://status.github.com, via https://octostatus-9676240.us-east-1.elb.amazonaws.com )
Part of the reason JPEG looks better in this case is that they have chosen to feature a detail- and noise-rich portion of the image, which favors JPEG... High JPEG compression has a sharpening effect around edges, including "ringing" which hides well in noise. However, if you view the full-sized comparison of the dog images, you can see that JPEG has essentially no detail in the darker portions of the image. Presumably both the MS-SIM metric and humans would judge RNN better for these portions.
While internet failure mitigation isn't an explicit goal of such projects, their resources might make a good starting point.