jbu

One of these went up near me. Pretty cool. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nfTkW87vmUQ

Were you thinking of methane instead of hydrogen? But the paper does seem hypy. H2 will have its place, but wire transfers electrons better than hydrogen.

Ahh, you nerd swiped me. I was involved in a hi rez phone before the iphone. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nokia_N80

This is not true in medical research. By induction why should it be true anywhere? The idea that scientists must never have an opinion is to dehumanise them.

I get value from using my AirPods while they last. They make my life better. Cryptocurrencies? Great if you got in at the top of the ponzi, but otherwise not.

But the whole point is to remove CO2 from the atmosphere. These just put it back in again.

All solutions should be considered. But we have solutions (electrification, present renewables) that are less risky than sunshades in many ways. Also, sunshades don't help the ocean acidification. So it'd be diverting resources to a fragile solution of a sub-problem when we only have the resources to solve the problems in an integrated way.

> but come on, you have to be more rational when you're playing in the $10B league.

Or, being able to choose between $10B and your values shows your character.

Here's some documentation of me getting one running. http://www.lshift.net/blog/2015/03/31/lets-run-science-part-... In short, yes they're open, but they tend to be what I call the 'science' coding style.

Car ring-tones! yay! I want crazy frog on my tesla.