1.5% is both terrifying from a Citrini scenario, but also not nearly close enough yet to replace my accountant. Like with everything the question will be how quickly it can add ~2 9s of accuracy - is that 2 years or 20
33 karma · joined June 18, 2014
1.5% is both terrifying from a Citrini scenario, but also not nearly close enough yet to replace my accountant. Like with everything the question will be how quickly it can add ~2 9s of accuracy - is that 2 years or 20
So I made a simple free app to do that. It works because like all parents my phone is filled to the gills with pictures of my children.
No ask, just figured I'd share in case someone else finds it interesting!
Pretty spot on.
But where do the people answering the phone come from? Is that service provided or it's expected we setup the interview and then kickoff this tool?
So we will need to extract the decision making responsibility from people management and let the Decision maker be exclusively focused on reviewing inputs, approving or rejecting. Under an SLA.
My hypothesis is that the future of work in tech will be a series of these input/output queue reviewers. It's going to be really boring I think. Probably like how it's boring being a factory robot monitor.
I don't think anyone at any level has any idea what the future is holding with this rapid pace of change. What some old timers think is going to be useful in a post-Claude world isn't really meaningful.
I think if I had limited time to prioritize learnings at the moment it would be prioritizing AI tooling comfort (e.g. getting comfortable doing 5 things shallowly in parallel) versus going super deep in understanding.
This is one role that I can't tell if it's completely useless in an AI powered world, or if that's basically what we all end up doing, reviewing and commenting on the work versus actually making it.
https://www.advisorperspectives.com/dshort/updates/2017/08/0...