149 karma · joined May 1, 2014
Now if I sign in using Apple, they are going to have the data to monetize. They may keep the app from getting my information, but that means that their data is better than someone else's data, so it is more valuable. Also, they are getting app usage statistics that I may have opted out of at the OS level, but they now have due to having the sign in history.
If you purchase liquid bandage in a drug store, it is just sterile CA glue.
To add to that value, if you become a team lead and have management responsibilities or have to manage budgets, it becomes even more helpful.
Then again, as someone above pointed out, I knew why I was getting an MBA. I can teach myself tech, but some of the business aspects are a pain to teach myself so I paid someone else to teach me those.
All of the problems blamed on "javascript" in this article aren't a problem with javascript itself, but the improper usage of certain frameworks in certain circumstances. Using a big bulky framework for an internal application where you know the user is constrained to machines that can perform well with that stack is fine. Using that same framework on a public web application that will also be hit by mobile applications is not. The problem isn't the framework, it is that the product team did not properly vet the performance impacts of the development team's choice of framework or did not properly specify the performance requirements for the product. One other option would be that the governance structure for ensuring that those requirements are met before release was insufficient. Either way, the problem isn't "javascript", but the SDLC processes used to build the software.
I don't know if that happened or not, but the way this article reads is very misleading and several of the vendors that they listed did not actually have access to the data.
The NY Times article makes it sound like Microsoft was allowed access to my data. They were not. They were allowed to create an app that had access to an API so I could access my data from the Windows Phone device.
That said, the company has to make sure that only the people that have a clinical need to access the data have access. So the developers would probably use a de-identified data set to write and test the program. Only the clinicians (care management and disease management nurses) would have access to the identified data so they can contact the patient to offer care.
Today, I do use OneNote almost exclusively because I'm not sharing the notes and they auto sync across my devices. Having OneNote open on my desktop, open the same note on my phone, take a picture of a white board and insert it, let the sync happen, and it is on my laptop is a very common scenario for me.
It explains the sovereignty of God in salvation very well. It is one of the best explanations of Reformed Theology that I've found that is meant for a non-seminary student.
I never claimed I wanted a pure democracy...
The issue is that it is easier to say they are all corrupt than it is to go out, do the homework, speak to the candidates, and then determine which ones mean what they say.
Instead of complaining about the system, why don't you learn the system and then do something about it.
Not being involved in the political process just completely removes any influence you have on the process and the outcomes. However, if your belief is that not voting is the right thing to do, then by all means, please abstain from voting. I'd rather only have engaged people vote anyway.
EDIT/Clarification: We don't have a pure democracy in the United States. We have representative democracy and a republic as pointed out below.
This lead me to realizing that having the stories side by side would make their bible study much simpler. Over about a weeks time, I through together para-gospel.com and hosted it on Azure.
I figured I'd post here for comments on making it better and also incase someone else would find it useful.