So I decided to put the question to 3 of the most advanced AIs I have access to using their “reasoning” models.
223 karma · joined September 8, 2011
http://www.jasonhanley.com
So I decided to put the question to 3 of the most advanced AIs I have access to using their “reasoning” models.
For others' benefit:
"Kurt Vonnegut explored themes of humans being observed by extraterrestrial beings in a zoo-like setting in his novel Slaughterhouse-Five. ... While this scenario involves humans being placed in a zoo by aliens, it does not specifically depict artificial intelligence (AI) as the captors. However, Vonnegut did address the impact of automation and machines on human society in his debut novel, Player Piano."
Amazing times we live in. Strange and scary, but also amazing.
Once humans learn enough, they are able to start coming up with and evaluating their own ideas.
This ability isn't 100% apparent with current public AI models, but I strongly suspect that this is happening behind the scenes.
Certainly researchers are already using AI extensively to improve AI, and that really has the potential to go exponential.
In terms of the HeyGen vid, it's passable, but that was something I literally whipped up in 10 minutes. You can make ones that are much, much better if you invest in creating better training material. The voice and video model in this case only used the one 3-minute source video.
Funny you mention the "people zoo" thing. That's actually part of a sci-fi story I've been trying to write since I was in my teens. Roughed out here: https://youtu.be/2KLdaVs_ugw
But it's really easy to overdo. And really easy to keep ramping up your dose as your body adjusts.
If you just want to _reduce_ your caffeine intake, I found that the easiest way is to pre-mix different ratios of regular and decaf in a container and use that. You can make 50:50 or 25:75 regular:decaf and easily taper off your intake (especially towards the afternoon/evening) while still enjoying a nice cup of coffee :)
Here's hoping...
To the author: I'm with you. Recently rebuilt my website and blog as an experiment in efficiency.
(edit: Forgot about Rust, sorry!)
Although some have said that Windows 2000 was more stable, I found the fusion of 95/98 into the NT kernel made it less so.
As mentioned elsewhere, web apps frequently "crash" (ie. fatal JS error) and have strange behavior.
And those bugs are often platform/browser/version-specific so very difficult to fix.
It's a serious problem with no clear solution.
In any case, glad I was hosted on Google infrastructure but embarrassed by the bloated, default Blogger template.
Interested in suggestions for simple, lightweight alternative.
Medium, Square, WordPress, etc. all seem to suffer from similar insane bloat.
Now they've taken web apps and packaged them up to run their own web server and browser locally with even more abstraction layers that chew through your system resources.
What a strange world.
The unfortunate thing is that Blogger started out being fairly light and clean -- at least it was back when I migrated to it.
At least static site generators are coming back into fashion. I've always considered them a better solution for media/news/blog type sites.
Yeah, it probably doesn't really help the situation when you build several layers of abstraction in an interpreted language that runs in a virtual space on a virtual machine using another abstraction layer running on virtual cores that go through complex OS layers that somehow eventually possibly map to real hardware.
Older versions of Android Facebook seem massively faster and use a fraction of the RAM while providing (nearly?) the same functions and features.
But I'd definitely be interested in any studies that have tried to measure these over long time periods.
For example IDEs: Visual Studio in 2017 is certainly better than Visual Studio in 1997, but do those advancements really justify the exponential growth in hardware requirements?
How'd we get so little usable functionality increase for such a massive increase in size/complexity?
Does anyone know a good way to do this with MediaWiki? (I'm new to the platform)
Is the Comments extension a decent way to go?
Some of the challenges: 1) Making sure the tablets actually make it to the people that need them and aren't repurposed/resold 2) Lack of internet so all content and apps need to be offline-friendly 3) Loading the tablets with content appropriate to the region (language, cultural)
The current process results in hiring people that are awesome at interview quiz questions, but can't sit down and do the actual day-to-day work.
But competition is always good!
Wikipedia, Facebook, MailChimp, WordPress, tons more -- they all load fast and are hardly ever down.
You can argue all day about the fine details of programming languages, but PHP is popular for good reasons.