HNHacker News
TopNewBestAskShowJobs

jansho

1,251 karma · joined March 13, 2017

Hello I’m in digital learning. Wish me luck that I’ll have the courage to start up soon! :)

If my tone is wrong, then apologies in advance. Yeah I can get carried away sometimes ...

PMs: janshohack(at)gmail(dot)com

submissionscomments
jansho··on Confessions of a Failed Female Coder
There seems to be a bit of a contradiction in her post:

> Despite the cargo shorts and the loner attitude, I learned like a girl.

And:

> it was an all-girls school, and every single other woman who took that computer science class that year became an engineer or scientist.

Hmm, it sounds more like she has a different learning style, which is not necessarily down to her femaleness.

That said, I think that at a fundamental level, there are differences in how men and women think. But none are better than the other, we know that we gain richer insights when we take both into account. But in this current political climate, it's unwise to go too deep about this, because it can so easily slip into the really nasty domains. Remember the time when phrenology was used to justify gender and race discrimination?

This is why I dislike Damore. I don't care what his manifesto says, but I bet that he knew exactly what he was doing. Playing games is pathetic, dude.

I can sympathise with the writer as I have a similar story too. I'm permanently put off from going into engineering, but I've accepted that and moved on. (Incidentally it's education and design, to better design learning experiences for everyone!) And that's OK, the burden of guilt of "letting down your kind" is also terrible. Life's too short and there are so many other interesting, under-explored areas ... and you can still get involved in tech. The best bit about tech? It's just a tool.

jansho··on Ask HN: What is your shoe size?
This is such a Saturday question - until I realised from your bio that you make shoes!
jansho··on Show HN: Who's Mentoring?
This is a really nice address book, thanks :) The UI is bare but does what it says on the tin. I hope this list keeps growing!
jansho··on Show HN: Resume Worded – Write impactful resumes
It's a bit disheartening to read those cool resume lines. Back to the garage I go, for that one-in-a-million smash-hit product ;)
jansho··on Playboy Interview: Steve Jobs (1985)
It's interesting that the Japanese never really did their own personal computers, as Jobs supposed. He was probably right though, computers are a different beast to things like the stereo, because it's always changing a la Moore's Law.
jansho··on Playboy Interview: Steve Jobs (1985)
Beautiful interview. I forgot how young, bombastic and intellectual Jobs was when he started Apple.

> The most compelling reason for most people to buy a computer for the home will be to link it into a nationwide communications network. We’re just in the beginning stages of what will be a truly remarkable breakthrough for most people—as remarkable as the telephone.

The last bit made me laugh out loud. It's technically true (!) and probably the iPhone was far more disruptive than personal computers.

jansho··on Redesigning the smartphone dial pad
Makes sense to study where finger activity is most active on the phone screen. I like Concept 1, it looks neater than the other "beehive" like structures. Think a left-hand version should be easily configured from Settings, if this is ever rolled out.
jansho··on Mathematical games interesting to both you and a five-year-old child
> The results here are obvious, Asian adults are kicking every other race's ass in basically every metric of success you can name.

Perhaps you need to look at more than just metrics of success. South Korea has one of the highest suicide rates in the world, and a lot of this is due to societal pressures like exams and work. While China's done what everyone was skeptical about 20 years ago, it now recognises that there's a dire lack of the "innovative spirit" - which really is part and parcel of being "free spirit".

I do agree that we can't just pander to children's interests only. Still too young, and they need basic education as a foundation. But childhood is also the perfect time to explore as much as possible, and plant those seeds of interest. Go the "Asian" way if you want, but just bear that in mind to strike a fair balance.

jansho··on How about we stop building apps for refugees and top up their phones instead?
Not such a strange idea! See how GiveDirectly works, and how they measure impact [1].

[1] https://www.givedirectly.org/research-at-give-directlyhttps:...

jansho··on Request for Education Startups
> Some teachers recognize this, which is why they are anti-tech.

And that is exactly why educators need education about edtech.

Edtech exists in many forms. The YC list will give you a snapshot of that. Most of it are actually supportive rather than replacing the teaching role itself. You cannot compare to other industries like manufacturing because they are vastly different.

IMO it's a bit unhealthy for educators to be technophobic. The current students are from the tech generation, and most likely appreciate if their teachers could show more digital fluency. And yes, there are so many good and bad edtech tools out there, but the point is they can be pick-n-mixed to make their jobs easier.

> In some class rooms I can simply use the bachelors-bearing teacher rather than the masters-bearing teacher.

All the good teachers I know are not defined by their qualification, rather the passion, idealism and talent that they give. I had a high school physics teacher with a doctorate and he was not too great at explaining concepts. I also have a maths teacher friend with 3rd class honours in her degree, but is currently one of the most popular teachers in her school.

Other than Montessori's, most teachers are actually not that adverse to tech. But I think a basic digital training is needed. At the very least, learn how to find resources and pull them together. Learn how to use basic software, like rudimentary game-makers. Learn how flipped classrooms work, to design better homeworks and classroom sessions. Learn how peer-learning works, to encourage sharing ideas and working as teams.

There's so many ideas to make learning more exciting, with more meaningful interactions. Edtech is not a major threat, it can be a sort of freedom.

Edit language.

jansho··on Request for Education Startups
I was referring to OP's eighth point, "the best teachers are on the Internet." Sorry if that was vague.

Yeah schools aren't perfect either, but it's very hard to replicate the teacher role online. Peers yes, but I'll eat my hat if anyone can come up with a digital platform that allows students and teachers (totally strangers) to connect and build relationships that last for years.

You might accidentally bump into a mentor, but that's extreeeemely rare. It's a nice dream though, hope it happens to me one day. But in all my time as an active participant in online courses (small sample, I know) the most personal interaction I got was someone reaching out via private messaging. This is totally within expectation though, many of us still unconsciously regard the Internet space as not really real.

jansho··on Request for Education Startups
Upvote for you, the teacher/school buy-in is the one factor that decides whether your edtech make or break.

There's a general reluctance to switch to another way of doing things, even if it's proven to be great, unless the cost-benefit is exponentially way better. Then there's another hurdle to overcome - re-training teachers, producing new classroom materials, changing lesson plans etc.

Perhaps it's no accident that the most popular edtech that we hear right now is Clever. (Or maybe that's just because we're on HN, haha)

jansho··on Request for Education Startups
> I think the current problem with education is being able to scale good teaching.

Well, I don't think that's the only problem with education.

Scaling good teaching, huh. Tackling this with direct technology is difficult, things like message boards for teachers are a bit crude.

So perhaps another way of approaching it is better training and support for teachers - and this is where tech can be used as support. Example, shadow a well-respected teacher with a camera, and post regularly on YouTube while encouraging open discussion.

Actually there is a lot of this content already (check out "Blended Learning" on Coursera, for example) so perhaps the real problem is actually aggregation and distribution.

jansho··on Request for Education Startups
I see a gap for educating teachers about the potential of edtech :) Many will welcome the opportunity to focus class time on quality interaction.
jansho··on Request for Education Startups
Interesting that you mentioned superstar tutors. Their classes tend to be large too, I've been to one that's close to a hundred pupils. A noticeable difference is that their sessions tend to be a lot more entertaining and emphasise on "tips and tricks" - not sure if school classrooms should follow the latter trend though.

It does show that it's possible to teach a large class effectively. Teaching talent makes all the difference, with technology to support it.

jansho··on Request for Education Startups
It's about solutionism, mostly.

"Let's move away from traditional models (which work well most of the time) and digitalise it all! Change the world for the better, oh and make "some" money on the way."

It's a bit cynical but there's some truth in it. This is the mistake that a lot of startups made in the last edtech 'revolution' - hopefully with YC releasing this edtech list, it means that we've become more educated about the education field, to come up with better tech solutions.

jansho··on Request for Education Startups
Respectfully, I disagree with a lot of the points here.

School isn't just about credentialing or dishing out information. You learn a lot about interacting with others, getting a social life, developing relationships with different people, discovering more about yourself and the list goes on. Even a bad experience is still an experience.

I'm in the digital learning field and can get doe-eyed about the potential of tech. But the Internet will never replace teachers. Many online courses can be excellent alternatives to class-learning, but not everyone learns best from sole Internet use or auto-didacting. And of course, when you do have a good teacher, that's irreplaceable.

Credentials can be a form of an elitist badge - so if this is the problem, then perhaps the best way to tackle it is to change mindsets, rather than change the whole system. Many good employers seem to be aware of this already.

I sometimes lean towards meritocracy too but it is terribly dangerous to apply Darwinism to education. Education is a right. Everyone NEEDS education, regardless of who they are and their level of natural intelligence. If the system starts favouring a certain type of people, or worse, implement a Darwinist funnel, that would be tragic for the majority of people, and will have a dangerous impact on society overall.

jansho··on China Blocks WhatsApp
> The more China closes up, the less Western companies have to fear about future tech dominance or crazy innovation from China in the long run.

Not sure about this, they're pretty prolific at sending their students out to learn from others. They've also invested a lot in their universities recently.

Also maybe innovation is a bit overrated? So far China's been doing well being the "world's giant copy machine", and learning from our mistakes to see what really works.

jansho··on Daniel Kahneman “I placed too much faith in underpowered studies”
> the more questions we ask, the more questions we have to answer, but also that many of the 'easy' hypotheses have been mined out.

Like a tree? The main branches are the most visible, and so the most tackled. The smaller branches are only realised when you're deep enough in it. That's where our age's advantage comes in, as we have many more qualified 'explorers' than before, but it also makes it all the more important that the foundational branches are solid.

But then again it may be closer to readjusting our lens. The big questions (of the natural kind, not innovation like AI) today still pertain what we take for granted, like quantum mechanics is making us question the nature of reality again. But much like the discovery of waves once threatened the credibility of light as particles, I'm optimistic that reconciliation can happen, and to ascend to another level ... but where can we stop? When can we say "This is it"?

Just musing..

jansho··on Daniel Kahneman “I placed too much faith in underpowered studies”
Then all the more reason for replication. Shouldn't we focus on making the foundation as robust as possible, before building more on it? It's possible to discover something exciting, or completely novel, but "exciting" and "novel" shouldn't really be the sole pursuit of a scientist. Rather, all outcomes including 'boring' ones should be considered with equal attention.
jansho··on Daniel Kahneman “I placed too much faith in underpowered studies”
> BTW, the lack of new results is actually a good thing. It means we've got a lot of stuff figured out.

Not necessarily. If anything, the more we find out, the more we realise how much we don't know. Take quantum physics, that stuff slowed down since the 1930s.

It's not a bad thing, the journey's always fun too. But let's not kid ourselves that we're close to figuring everything out.

jansho··on Writer's Block, or the Wantrepreneur Blues
> Wake up at 4pm-4:30pm (yes I need a full 8 hours every night, not negotiable), you'll have much more willpower to tackle your side project in the morning before your kids wake up.

This is the exact tactic used by a friend studying PhD with five young kids. She got the PhD in four years.

Also if you do a lot of manual labour - gardening, stacking shelves whatever - sleep becomes the obvious choice.

jansho··on The Uncomfortable – a collection of deliberately inconvenient objects
Clever, and driving my OCD side mad. The uncomfortable mug doesn't look too bad though, I can imagine a mittened hand slipping through the handle.
jansho··on Ask HN: What audio resources can improve my technical skills during my commute?
Thanks for bringing up Four Seasons. I listened to Spring, it doesn't really fit what I asked about and initially I thought it was too poncey. But then it develops on like a teasing narrative (if that even makes sense, my musical vocabs is way too limited) - interesting!
jansho··on Flat UI Elements Attract Less Attention and Cause Uncertainty
Very true but it's just boring. I'm shooting myself in the foot! Reading back my older post, I haven't been very thoughtful about expressing it properly; I simply think that the current trends such as one-scroll webpages also dictate (unintentionally maybe) about what kind of content should be put on and how they should be presented, resulting in many websites that look the same and feel the same. This is a shame because the great differentiator should be content.
jansho··on Ask HN: What audio resources can improve my technical skills during my commute?
Can you recommend any minimalist classical music (other than Arvo Part) please? Not bland, it can be sensual like Gnossienne or dramatic as... tabula rasa?

My main issue with most classical music is that they feel too heavy and I feel physically sick.

jansho··on Flat UI Elements Attract Less Attention and Cause Uncertainty
There does seem to be a few brutalist articles knocking around lately but I think it'll stay a niche. Most designers are actually pretty lazy (or just prone to following trends, like other professions?) and would be happy to follow any good design docs (Material Design etc) then apply their own interpretation. But with brutalist UI, since it's usually accompanied by a sort of shock factor, it requires a bit more ingenuity than just choosing a unique colour palette. It also tends to be hit-or-miss, and that's risky.

There's some noise about creating the next interface for flat screens and VR/AR (Microsoft again) which as long as VR isn't mainstream, I think it'll be more of a play (and fad.)

I also think that the ideal UI doc (may not be the next trend) combine skeuomorphism and flat while leaving plenty of space for designers to express their own ingenuity through content. At this moment, you can feel UI dictating how the content should be created and organised; all those one-scroll container webpages and humble-braggy profiles bore me to death.

But the best UI takes a back seat while content is the main performer, OR, at the very least there is a variable organic component - Google's doodly homepage fits the latter actually. This sounds so stupidly obvious to point out, but I feel that too much effort is being spent on innovating UI than the content itself. Content is far more exciting and challenging! Storytelling is often done in one medium, but what if you use several, one for each small part of the experience? What if you focus on creating multiple micro experiences? (Not necessarily animated micro-interactions.) That for me is the real task of UX designers - not just organise flow but how best to present content as a memorable story.

jansho··on Flat UI Elements Attract Less Attention and Cause Uncertainty
Well there I was, thinking that maybe rejecting the free upgrade might have been a bit petty after all. I'm not a big hater of flat UI but phew, Windows 10 is ugly. Flat UI should have high contrast but with a feeling of lightness. For some reason Windows 10 went for a super dark palette: black, magenta, navy, blood orange etc. Sorry, not for my workstation.

On the other side of the spectrum, plenty focus too much on being neat and consistent that they become greyish, bland and sacrifice usability. Good ones use colours, shadows and placements wisely so that navigation does feel lighter and the experience is more content-focused.

Excellent ones do all that but without burdening the audience with that nasty aftertaste of pretentiousness.

Learn the rules, then break the ones you can't agree with. It's the designer's privilege to be able to do this more often than developers can ;)

jansho··on Y Combinator Fall Tour 2017
I wouldn't care if it's Isle of Wight or something :(
jansho··on I spent my career in tech, but wasn’t prepared for its effect on my kids
"The most important thing we've learned,

So far as children are concerned,

Is never, NEVER, NEVER let

Them near your television set --

Or better still, just don't install

The idiotic thing at all.

In almost every house we've been,

We've watched them gaping at the screen.

They loll and slop and lounge about,

And stare until their eyes pop out.

(Last week in someone's place we saw

A dozen eyeballs on the floor.)

They sit and stare and stare and sit

Until they're hypnotised by it,

Until they're absolutely drunk

With all that shocking ghastly junk.

Oh yes, we know it keeps them still,

They don't climb out the window sill,

They never fight or kick or punch,

They leave you free to cook the lunch

And wash the dishes in the sink --

But did you ever stop to think,

To wonder just exactly what

This does to your beloved tot?

IT ROTS THE SENSE IN THE HEAD!

IT KILLS IMAGINATION DEAD!

IT CLOGS AND CLUTTERS UP THE MIND!

IT MAKES A CHILD SO DULL AND BLIND

HE CAN NO LONGER UNDERSTAND

A FANTASY, A FAIRYLAND!

HIS BRAIN BECOMES AS SOFT AS CHEESE!

HIS POWERS OF THINKING RUST AND FREEZE!

HE CANNOT THINK -- HE ONLY SEES!

'All right!' you'll cry. 'All right!' you'll say,

'But if we take the set away,

What shall we do to entertain

Our darling children? Please explain!'

We'll answer this by asking you,

'What used the darling ones to do?

'How used they keep themselves contented

Before this monster was invented?'

Have you forgotten? Don't you know?

We'll say it very loud and slow:

THEY ... USED ... TO ... READ! They'd READ and READ,

AND READ and READ, and then proceed

To READ some more. Great Scott! Gadzooks!

One half their lives was reading books!

The nursery shelves held books galore!

Books cluttered up the nursery floor!

And in the bedroom, by the bed,

More books were waiting to be read!

Such wondrous, fine, fantastic tales

Of dragons, gypsies, queens, and whales

And treasure isles, and distant shores

Where smugglers rowed with muffled oars,

And pirates wearing purple pants,

And sailing ships and elephants,

And cannibals crouching 'round the pot,

Stirring away at something hot.

(It smells so good, what can it be?

Good gracious, it's Penelope.)

The younger ones had Beatrix Potter

With Mr. Tod, the dirty rotter,

And Squirrel Nutkin, Pigling Bland,

And Mrs. Tiggy-Winkle and-

Just How The Camel Got His Hump,

And How the Monkey Lost His Rump,

And Mr. Toad, and bless my soul,

There's Mr. Rat and Mr. Mole-

Oh, books, what books they used to know,

Those children living long ago!

So please, oh please, we beg, we pray,

Go throw your TV set away,

And in its place you can install

A lovely bookshelf on the wall.

Then fill the shelves with lots of books,

Ignoring all the dirty looks,

The screams and yells, the bites and kicks,

And children hitting you with sticks-

Fear not, because we promise you

That, in about a week or two

Of having nothing else to do,

They'll now begin to feel the need

Of having something to read.

And once they start -- oh boy, oh boy!

You watch the slowly growing joy

That fills their hearts. They'll grow so keen

They'll wonder what they'd ever seen

In that ridiculous machine,

That nauseating, foul, unclean,

Repulsive television screen!

And later, each and every kid

Will love you more for what you did."

--

Roald Dahl died in 1990, I wonder what he would think about smartphones :)

← PreviousPage 4 of 11Next →