jamescampbell

In publishing context, typeset usually implies / means printing physical copy, I think you mean "beautifully formatted ebooks"?

_but why blockchain_

Voting (as was bore out in many examples including digg.com and elsewhere) becomes a mob rule situation and variation of tyranny of the commons without a novelty algorithm in addition to total votes. If you just go by totals, it will be easily gamified and rendered useless as a metric.

This is great. I think there is a theory going that any tool that exists in Python will eventually be ported to golang (and be 10x better).

So it is basically like you took an open source trello codebase and cloned it and rebranded it as a notes tool even though it is still card based and taggable and groupable like trello? I don't get it.

Some feedback:

1. Would love to see it as historical scroll back of peoples vents, maybe keep for past 24 hours rolling?

2. Would be cool to go along with 1 to have vote up or down button to self-regulate and also to see vents / rants of day.

This gives me an idea of building a type of web application firewall that would be used for chat related sites like this that would automatically block bots/spammers/trolls.

I would use it. You could probably wrap current search engines and crawl sites for <ad> tags etc. and label them as ad vs non ad from there in very basic way and them get more complicated with built-up heuristics.

In my experience, every developer that I hired self-taught was 10x better at solving problems and getting things done themselves than traditionally taught.

You just save that as a new bookmark after updated your endpoint and you can gather that data quickly.

Yeah its not that bad, here is a simple bookmarklet example that grabs current url and posts it to your endpoint (mailephant in this case). Might be a good first step.

  javascript:q=location.href;if(document.getSelection)%7Bd=document.getSelection();
  %7Delse%7Bd='';%7D;p=document.title;void(open('https://mailephant.email/views/curate.html? 
  showtags=yes&url='+encodeURIComponent(q)+'&description='+encodeURIComponent(d)+'&
  title='+encodeURIComponent(p),'Mailephant','toolbar=no,scrollbars=yes,width=550,height=700'));

I just tried it out and it works. https://multy.me/l3uepo

I would love a browser add-on to go with this to gather up the links as you browse. I used to do this with mailephant (now defunct) that allowed me to queue up links and snippets of text related to links in a nice list to email along with an email template. good work and definitely useful.

I am with you. This makes no sense to me. But I also have wrapped userdata or account data in a generated hash to quickly have access to the underlying account info / expiration info etc. I think it is easier to justify why to implement vs. why not to implement.

The pricing model is amazing. Either free up to 100 users or a modest under $100 USD per year for unlimited. Perfection.

I also love the security write up.

I had a similar setup using redis and zsets so this type of use case and implementation makes sense to me.

I am wondering, give the constraint of keeping it in Python as a pypi library, can I optimize my code further? My benchmarks against nmap could also use improved rigor.

Git yolo for life!

Yes. Not sure why he built it this way at all. Makes no sense to me.

Wow. Wow. Wow. I have nothing else to say.

My heart shuddered when I read the headline. I can’t be alone in the fear.

Beast mode has been great. I want a python cli for it and heaven.

I've used and setup SpiderFoot for others. It works fine and usually does enough that it helps more than hurts.

That is a great guide as well, most of my setups are headless and wireless. Cheers

fixed and pushed, 1.0.4 released.

Ah, just found it, https://raspberrypi.stackexchange.com/a/100513/36948 The Raspberry Pi 4 has the new standard mac address, so findpi would miss that right now! Will fix this and push 1.0.4 release asap.

Thanks, interesting, I was going off of this, I thought, canonical list: https://gist.github.com/aallan/b4bb86db86079509e6159810ae9bd... that only has the one Mac Address on it. I also found a second source to back up the claim that DC:A6:32 should be added as well here: https://dnslytics.com/mac-address-lookup by searching for Raspberry Pi. Thanks for pointing this out!

nice!

I thought I posted the command in the readme, nmap -sP. Yeah I remember reading about nmap adding parallelization. According to the link you shared: "By default, Nmap calculates an ever-changing ideal parallelism based on network performance". So my benchmarks are based on comparing against that. I don't know why my implementation is faster, but the three tests I performed show that findpi is faster. I guess because I am forcing more threads than nmap's ever-changing ideal is allocating?