jaimeiniesta

Hello, I'm the creator of Rocket Validator - it's a subscription-based service, but there's a free demo you can try, no signup required.

Some parts of it are open sourced:

https://github.com/jaimeiniesta/funkspector

https://github.com/sitevalidator/funchaku

https://github.com/sitevalidator/nu-cat

Thanks!

I'm using it as a beta user, and I find it really helpful.

I used to do this kind of things with a spreadsheet, but this tool automates it and gives you nice charts.

What this service does is, given a starting URL, scrapes the site in search for internal pages, validates them all using the W3C validator and gives back a report with all the common errors and warnings found, as well as detailed reports.

Here is an example report: https://www.w3clove.com/sitemaps/check?url=http%3A%2F%2Fvali...

Thanks Mike, I've updated the charts. It really looks better as a bar chart:

http://w3clove.com/charts/errors/bar

Sounds good, I'll make an alternative version using bars.

sure, it's the arrows. Should this be done with characters, instead? Maybe CSS? This would be indeed a good case of using "alt"... alt="vote up", alt="vote down"

It's interesting to see the validation for Hacker News:

http://w3clove.com/sitemaps/check?url=http%3A%2F%2Fnews.ycom...

You wouldn't tell there were so many images, would you? Should they have an "alt" attribute?

yeah I too agree that the "alt" attribute should not be considered an error. Maybe just a warning.

There's a separate chart for the top 100 warnings:

http://w3clove.com/charts/warnings