3,783 karma · joined November 20, 2010
Had a very similar experience for another product as well.
At this point, I hesitate to look up stuff on Amazon just considering the time it takes to find stuff. I much rather prefer a curated list of products so someone else has done the weeding out.
It seems like Amazon’s philosophy of having the widest set of options for every product is actually not that useful in practice, at least for me.
The only reason I still keep going back is that they deliver many products on the same day to the neighborhood I live in.
Disclaimer: I work on Typesense.
We're now at v0.24.rc, and we've iterated quite a lot on improving relevancy since then, as more users shared their datasets with us and gave us feedback over the last 1.5 years.
If you get a chance to try out Typesense again in the future, I'd love to hear how relevance feels with the latest version, out of the box for your dataset.
I’d love to take a closer look.
From an article I wrote recently on this topic [2]:
> Selling Stock vs Selling Search
One key realization we had is that when we bring on investors, we are essentially bringing on a new group of customers - customers for whom the product is our company stock.
The value this group of customers (investors) gets from the product they are buying (stocks) is appreciating stock prices. And the way we can keep this group of customers happy is by regularly raising the next round of funding which is when stock prices appreciate, or having a liquidity event to make a return on investment.
We are concerned that “launching” a new “product line” (selling stocks) and bringing on a whole new group of customers (investors), would cause us to lose our precious bandwidth that could have otherwise been spent on our core search product that our primary group of users and customers expect from us. After all, the “company stock” product line would not exist without the core search product.
[2] https://typesense.org/blog/why-we-are-not-raising-funds/
We're also actively working on adding Vector search to Typesense: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32851894
Typesense holds the entire index in memory, in order to enable fast search where every keystroke returns results in 50-150ms. So it’s built primarily to enable user-facing search.
It’s not a good fit for log search since putting your entire log dataset in memory can become expensive depending on the size of your logs, and you typically don’t need search-as-you-type for log search.
Zinc on the other hand seems to be designed specifically for log search.
I've heard about DataTables in various contexts over the years, so it's really cool to hear that you've integrated it with Typesense.
This is an interesting acquisition from my perspective because we also just started working on adding vector search to Typesense about a month ago.
So you can now do nearest neighbor searches by bringing your vectors into Typesense. This lets you do things like similarity searches, recommendations, etc.
I’d love to have more beta testers use the feature and give us feedback. If you’d like to try it out, please send me an email: jasonb at typesense dOt org
In any case, congratulations Search.io / Sajari team!
I’ve also had a tough time describing it, so couldn’t Google for it. I’ve also held off on taking it to the apple store to get it looked at, just because I didn’t know how to describe it well. May be I’ll just use your description now.
Just yesterday two people told me that they hear echos when I use my AirPods on two different meetings, so I had to switch to using wired headphones. Adding that to my list of problems. I wish I could just return the product now.
They took AGPL and modified it a bit to arrive at SSPL (See Section 13).
This was the push we needed to start working full-time on Typesense: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22181437
The domain is even listed on the USPTO site as a scam operation [2], yet no action has been taken yet.
[1] Looks like this: https://www.uspto.gov/sites/default/files/documents/WTP%20Tr...
[2] https://www.uspto.gov/trademarks/protect/caution-misleading-...
Given that you're purchasing 3-year RIs and then selling them on the marketplace, do you have stats on the risk of a listing not being purchased by someone for an extended period of time, and that eating into the potential savings?
> This is saving early customers over 50% in some cases
Does this 50% number account for the risk of unused RIs sitting unsold in the marketplace?
I saw in your docs that you're pursuing SOC2 compliance in 2022. Any updates on the timeline?
Do you take into account existing Savings Plan purchases and existing RIs that the account already has?
I would call this product discovery and development with early adopters, something I hope every startup is doing. I've also seen this be called a Lighthouse program.
> Managing enterprise customers is easier than managing thousands or small companies. And it also create a natural barrier to entry
I definitely get the appeal. To build a billion dollar revenue (not valuation) venture scale company, you can either get 1000 users paying you 1M dollars each, or 1M users paying you $1000 each [1].
It's just painful as a relative early customer to get priced out and no longer be the target market for a company, especially when it has set its eyes on exponential growth and starts to see the SMB market as a means to an end.
[1] https://christophjanz.blogspot.com/2014/10/five-ways-to-buil...
Let me know when you do!
Start bottoms up, give away free or low/no margin services, gain adoption, capture the market, then with the pressure to grow, they start moving upmarket, go after 100K+ deals and raise prices, and eventually price out / fire vast chunks of their early adopters.
Been personally bit by this a few times, so these days I tend to very cautious about adopting non-organic software, at least not without a backup plan.
I’m a founder myself and this is one big concern I have about raising VC funds. Wrote about this here recently: https://typesense.org/blog/why-we-are-not-raising-funds/
I’ve also started to use the term customer-funded (similar to VC-funded), instead of “bootstrapped”, since the latter seems to give off an impression of early stage whereas the former is a conscious choice and state of being.
[1] https://twitter.com/jasonbosco/status/1524483471988727809?s=...
—-
Hi ,
Amazing product, Congratulations on the launch of your product, in product hunt .your product post deserves to get top 5. I saw your product hunt post, it got 23 votes. But still don't get any badge. I am Interested to help you to get, product of the day #1-5 badge 100% Guarantee. I can boost & promote your Product Hunt campaign & also can make your product, Product of the Day #1-5 Position only for $100. After successfully completing my work you can pay me. Increase more sales and engagement. You can be 100% sure that I won't violate PH's T&C. The product will be 100% safe. I hope that you can see the rank improvement within 1-2 hours after starting my work. Let me know if have anything else you want to know. Best Regards