The experience integrating with Withings was really good. Garmin on the other hand seems to be actively hostile if you (as an end user) want to programmatically interact with their ecosystem.
916 karma · joined May 4, 2012
The experience integrating with Withings was really good. Garmin on the other hand seems to be actively hostile if you (as an end user) want to programmatically interact with their ecosystem.
I suspect that nobody, including the authors, ever read this 391 page report.
The current cap of 500€ is a good compromise IMHO: It deters people from issuing unnecessary FoI requests while at the same time keeping it in reach for the average person if they really want that information.
Also also want to invoice you for all costs that your request causes. Previously it was capped at 500€. So your request could cost you thousands of euros. You are at the mercy of the government how many people are working on your request and how efficient they process it.
After acquiring Komoot, they fired everybody. Watching their goodbye video is a bit heartbreaking: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qLJkK4Wn1HI
"We are observing elevated error rates when accessing objects stored in the affected region. Impacted customers may experience increased latency or intermittent failures while retrieving debris adjacent data." /s
Still I think it would have been better for OP to link to the source to avoid exactly this confusion.
Also a fun fact: For a long time it was only semi-officially known that the BND owned and operated the site. Officially it was called "Long distance telecommunications station of the Bundeswehr" and operated by the "Federal Office for Telecommunications Statistics"
For the debugger use case: If the IDE has already focus, it can pass an activation token to the debugger and the debugger can use this to focus itself. If the IDE is not focused, I don't want the debugger to steal focus.
Also, why are you mentioning the look of people in a discussion about cars and manufacturing?
In the last decade of writing Java software I didn't ever come across a genuine GC bug where a unreferenced object wasn't collected. I'm not disputing that they exist, but if you regularly hit such "bugs" I'm wondering if your understanding of Java GC might be flawed.
Do you expect objects to be immediately collected when they are not reachable anymore?
So it often comes down to this choice: Open https://copilot.cloud.microsoft/, go through the Microsoft 365 login process, dig your phone out for two-factor authentication, approve it via Microsoft Authenticator, finally type your request only to get a response that feels strangely lobotomized.
Or… just go to https://chatgpt.com/, type your prompt, and actually get an answer you can work with.
It feels like every part of Microsoft wants to do the right thing, but in the end they come out with an inferior product.
One annoying thing is that tiered storage is not available on their Azure offering, and also in general it feels like managed service for TimescaleDB is the unloved stepchild of their offering.
But yes, I hope the team continues their amazing work, and I'm looking forward to seeing how the project develops in the future.
It's not making it impossible to run GNOME on non-systemd systems, but it shifts the responsibility of maintaining that support to the projects that are actually interested in it. I think ultimately this might lead to a better user experience since the people developing non-systemd support are also the ones using it.
That might be the case in very controlled environments such as a subway network, but in other, more heterogeneous environments GoA 4 is not there yet.
[1] https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/entra/identity/conditional...
Otherwise this quote wouldn't make sense:
> [...] top-tier user privileges that neither Berulis nor his boss possessed
However, my guess would be that this is the role that DOGE employees requested to be assigned as it is the role with the highest level of privileges.
Then why use encryption at all when your threat model for encrypted communication can't handle a malicious actor on the network?
something_is_valid = something > 0 and something != foo and something > bar
if something_is_valid:
# do stuff
That way you can document the intention of the condition using the variable name while at the same time keeping the locality of the check.This definition is nowhere to be found. I assume it's your interpretation, which, as already said, is flawed.
For example Saudi Arabia is listed on all of those indices even though its an absolute monarchy and the poster child for an autocracy.