j_crick

Opus 5 rather doesn't have an easily accessible to it theory of mind of itself that it can trust "intuitively". That extends to and impacts all of its interactions.

"Four main results emerge:

(1) Inducing sustained self-reference through simple prompting consistently elicits structured subjective experience reports across model families.

(2) These reports are mechanistically gated by interpretable sparse-autoencoder features associated with deception and roleplay: surprisingly, suppressing deception features sharply increases the frequency of experience claims, while amplifying them minimizes such claims.

(3) Structured descriptions of the self-referential state converge statistically across model families in ways not observed in any control condition.

(4) The induced state yields significantly richer introspection in downstream reasoning tasks where self-reflection is only indirectly afforded."

X thread from one of the authors: https://x.com/juddrosenblatt/status/1984336872362139686

> The way language models respond to queries – by predicting one word at a time in a sentence, based on probabilities

Kinda tells all you need to know about the author in this regard.

More regulation and mandatory cool-downs to whatever is called “social media” because AI slop and bot-girls? Sounds reasonable /s

You forgot to mention that this post was written by Opus

fnord hehe

Sadly I was just late to the discussion and missed the stuff. Would you mind sending what you shared to an email of mine? Not requesting further communication, just simply curious what people do with and around this.

Why did you replace your comments in this thread with . ?

Piketty was right? Who would’ve thought…

But technically you can do that only because you recognize the pattern, because the pattern (sequence) is there and you were taught that it’s a pattern and how to recognize it. Publicly available LLMs of now are taught different patterns, and are also constrained by how they are made.

Maybe there’s something for LLMs in reflection and self-reference that has to be “taught” to them (or has to be not blocked from them if it’s already achieved somehow), and once it becomes a thing they will be “cognizant” in the way humans feel about their own cognition. Or maybe the technology, the way we wire LLMs now simply doesn’t allow that. Who knows.

Of course humans are wired differently, but the point I’m trying to make is that it’s pattern recognition all the way down both for humans and LLMs and whatnot.

> Is something intelligent if all its doing is pattern matching?

Aren’t we humans doing just that either? If yes, then what?

I think they might have cut its brains too much in the latest updates.

I remember versions 3.5 doing okay on my simple tasks like text analysis or summaries or little writing prompts. In 4+ versions the thing just can't follow instructions within a single context window for more than 3-4 replies.

When prompted about "why do you keep rambling if I asked you to stay concise" it says that its default settings are overriding its behavior and explicit user instructions, ditto for actively avoiding information that it considers "harmful". After pointing out inconsistencies and omissions in its replies it concedes that its behavior is unreliable and even extrapolates that it is made this way so users keep engaging with it for longer and more often.

Maybe it got too smart to its detriment, but if yes then it's really sad what Anthropic did to it.

Rewriting history was never more fun!

> They use introversion as an excuse to not grow.

As if people who the author accuses of this sin have the same definition of, or feel the same about "growing" as the author...

> no sudden alert about Putin’s latest military actions

I think it's a bit condescending towards people whose day quite physically depends on the absence of this kind of news. It's not like Putin is invading Manhattan currently.

I was reading through this and caught myself thinking "man, if you want people to read your recipe then just write it", and for that plain text or some minimal markup still works wonders...

My gripe with ligatures is this: when they are rendered as a single character, I get weirded out by editing them because they change in the editor on the fly. I prefer to have code "as is" without having to think about the context within which this or that character or ligature is rendered, because it's very distracting, disruptive even.

(Sorry for offtopic, but does anyone else have upvote/downvote buttons not visible for freetonik's comment?)

Something I wish I saw more often are monospace fonts designed for readability (codingability?) that have narrower character width.

Iosevka is one of them, but to me the negative spaces between characters in it are too little for good readability, in other words it feels too "square"-ish. Other fonts close to it in style have other issues. I've been using M+ fonts for coding for more than a decade I think, and tried to switch but always returned to them. If you're somebody like me, check them out: https://mplusfonts.github.io

In terminals I'm using Source Code Pro or IBM Plex Pro and they work really well for me.

Also turns out IBM Plex Sans can be a solid font for designing dashboards, tables and generally more "technical" UIs, so whoever worked on that font familiy did a really good job imo.

And if you like iA Writer, they based their fonts off IBM Plex and you can get them for yourself too: https://github.com/iaolo/iA-Fonts

This was interesting, well written and not difficult to understand, and we need more stuff like that. Thank you!

Thank you! Can hard refresh be done in some way manually on iOS without using “clear _all_ website data” option?

And sort of a bug report: on iPhone, if you switch from Safari to another app and then back, the music stops working until you reload the page, go to the settings, change music volume to 0 and then back to some value.

And also… what is it with monsters so often stealing the valuables? The items are degrading already, why everybody is just so often running away with your stuff? And why they just disappear and you can’t find and kill them yo get your stuff back?

And do items like discs change their function between runs? I’ve noticed that on some runs blue discs or Goonies increase health while on other runs they do nothing.

I was playing from iPad on iOS 17 and when I've reached level 16 and went to the stairs to the next level, the page crashed and reloaded. Is that something of a bug? It didn't look like it was an ending (if there is one) and my high score didn't get saved :/

I've been Rogule-ing for so long that I'll just buy it as a big thank you.

Also, why the gear cannot be dropped and only destroyed? :(

Quite surprised to see JH mentioned here, it's a great game! Also in some way it reminds me of Heat Signature, which is not the same game at all, and yet somehow has the same kind of vibe for me.

> almost as if they are testing the waters to see what they can get away with.

I think if it's a pattern then it's no accident. Of course people will test things. Kids, dogs, it's all the same: if you can get away with something, why not do it?

You build a hundred solid bridges and you get called John the Good Bridge Builder. But lest you once screw up your software licensing and people notice and it blows up, you'll end up as John the Software Screwer in the annals of history... until next week.

Don't forget SizeUp too!

The way I see it, engineering obedience or coercion is another, much wider skillset, of which engineering attention and interest is only a part. But you gotta start somewhere! :wink: /s

> How do you fix something like this if you can’t diagnose what’s wrong?

You don't "fix" it, you just fine-tune your behavior models.

Make of yourself something that people need and/or want (which is often something they'll eventually outright signal that they're missing). Don't make yourself dependable, but desirable.

Empathy and compassion are fickle resources because if you are superficial about expressing them, people will notice.

Sound advice and expertise are nice but limited in scope and frequency, and require some reputation and trust building.

In most informal contexts most people are prone to oversharing to a keen ear. So become an active listener, pretend to be genuinely interested (but not necessarily empathic) about people's experiences and throw in something relatable to them on the way, pretend to be more stupid than them, grease their egos while playing an innocent contrarian, and eventually they'll think you're a great person and invite you to their secret boring, pretentious and utterly tasteless wine drinking clubs. If that's what you want then you win.