307 karma · joined June 15, 2016
No matter how amazing the process is, without good people, you’ll fail.
I like OKRs, but I benefit from being with smart people.
Worse than “can not afford”, they do not have access to fruit and veggis to start with. Do a search on “food desert” or “poor access fruit”. It is not good.
https://www.google.com/search?&q=concrete+patent&oq=concrete...
The attack seemed to begin late Thursday night and by Friday had spread to critical areas needed to publish the paper. Technology teams from both companies made significant progress against the threat, but were unable to clear all systems before press time.”
I feel I can’t. So much to do...
(ed: spelling)
It's not about saying "it's bad". It's about talking about what might be better. Flat hierarchy or not, anyone should be able to bring up the topic.
And if you can't, that's a bad place to be working. There should be some kind of trust between people.
You don't need any kind of hierarchy to have real leaders. Every where I've been, you just step up and try to make it happen. Most of the time a bunch of other people are going to "thank you!". It won't always work and you can be diplomatic in how you approach it. But just make it happen and stop waiting for someone else to do it.
And if they, whomever they is, don't like it, move on.
A critical piece of making the open space work is people being open with another. For watching big events on tv, you can take that into a conference room too. Cheer all you want. Gotta call your partner or someone else? Go in a room.
In many organizations I have seen the deep technical skills one gains through their career are not valued in the same way "Mgmt. Skills" are. "Mgmt. skills" are or at least appear to be much easier for an organization to see and reward. This is a great story!
My response was - "I don't know. I need to spend time getting to know the team, understand our product, and better understand priorities."
I try to use this question in interviews with senior people, be they Developers or Managers. It can expose someone who will quickly blow your team up should they join. I like working with people who have great passion and will stand up for their ideas, but understanding the problem first is alway wise!
Getting to know people, products, and customers, (not that customers aren't people) with listening and questions makes everyone better.
I was wrong.
Perhaps it would be better to remove "remote" from the title completely. You may have several locations where people can come together, don't call them headquarters and those not there remote, but instead everyone is team member who sits in various sites. Some of those sites have 1 person, others have 4 or 5 or 10. And those with more than an individual
There are many amazing places well beyond Silicon Valley for STEM careers. And in startups if that is the route you want to go. I'm in the Minneapolis/St. Paul area. We have a vibrant startup community and the unemployment rate is near 0. No matter if you want to go startup, small company, or large, you can find it here with great pay and benefits.
The people here are fantastic. You can live in the city or suburbs for an affordable amount of money and escape the city in 30 minutes if you want to get away. Great place.
Not to mention Austin, Chicago, and so many more. Don't limit your looking to just the valley. There is much more out there.
Taxes are necessary. But in the case of corporations I think the problem is not about what the right corporate tax rate should be but instead what does a company do when they effectively have so much cash they can not find good options to invest that money in.
If one of these companies suddenly reports a significant drop in cash due to aggressive investments in something that is failing (say, perhaps building an autonomous car) their stock will be punished, a very negative incentive.
The real question: is a company investing this cash the right thing to do? IMO it is, we want that money at work, building something. I don’t believe taxes can solve this. Instead can we need to find a way for companies to be able to invest this money in new ideas but not be so punitive via the markets when they try things that fail.
Especially the "No thanks, I don’t want to learn more." button to dismiss it. Pretty condescending in my opinion.
On mobile that popped up immediately. I did click on through and read the article despite that, but my interest in coming back to that site is diminished by the sense of arrogance displayed in that pop up.
I'd be interested to understand what you ran into in more detail.