903 karma · joined September 10, 2011
[0]http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=137692
Also the top post in this article is just someone calling this a "Christmas present"; at least you made me chuckle.
1) It doesn't work in Youtube.com itself and it doesn't have anything to do with copyright but with the uploaders preferences (but yes, song owners sometimes enforce this setting on behalf of other users).
2) Many music videos are disabled; so call this a patch is technically inaccurate because it probably disables more videos than it enables wish is something that makes "gets the job done" a debatable statement.
3) To point out a bug doesn't mean I am willing or able to fix it; that is not how open-source works anyway.
And this is a healthy reminder that when you mess with someone else platform without an actual API you have to test a lot... because you don't understand anything about the implementation; not to mention it could change anytime (especially something as experimental as HTML5 video tag).
2) You don't understood what i said; when you change #watch-player for an iframe it wrongly believes you are watching it from a third-party website when in fact you are watching it from youtube.com itself. So many videos become unwatchable because those are configured to be watched only in youtube.com
Example: http://i.imgur.com/TZpWp.jpg (Translation: EMG doesn't want you to watch this outside youtube.com)
Pretty nice site; would be nice to be able to login using Twitter.
-webkit-text-size-adjust: none;
This CSS rule in that site is the worst kind of CSS rule; one that disables basic browser functionality.You are also talking like a paranoid; incidences with internet used to release deathly viruses are so far only videogames stories and DDOS attacks have more similarities with an electricity outage than to killing someone. And not a single bank got broke because some DDOS attack.
We delivered to Shlomo. He couldn’t believe how fast we did it. He couldn’t believe we also did the GIA certificates the way we did. He paid us in cash — $35,000. I took, $17,500. He gave us more work.
The only appropriate response is: wut?
But in all seriousness this story is lacking some good storytelling and any teaching (besides perl being a good programming language to create websites in 1997).
Someone else's child porn is going in your taxi when you are a taxi driver.
Someone else's child porn is being recorded at your house when you rent your house to someone unknown to you.
By your line of logic we should all sit still and do nothing because otherwise we may be helping a pedophile.