Criminals can easily show Google crawlers "good" websites.
The fact that Safe Browsing even works is already good enough.
2,344 karma · joined December 31, 2019
Not under my usual nickname since it's taken here
The fact that Safe Browsing even works is already good enough.
AI is mocked even though the vast majority of Ars commenters have extensively been using chatbots for years. You know how it's called? Hypocrisy.
Nothing in their EULA or ToS says anything about this.
And their appeal form simply doesn't work. Out of my four requests to lift the ban, they've replied once and didn't say anything about the nature about that. They just declined.
Fuck Claude. Seriously. Fuck Claude. Maybe they've got too much money, so they don't care about their paying customers.
LeCun hasn't produced anything noteworthy in the past decade.
He uses the same slides in all of his presentations.
LLMs, while not yet AGI, have shown tremendous progress, and are actually useful for 99% of use cases for the average person.
The remaining 1% is for deep research into the deep unknown (physics, chemistry, genetics, diseases, the nature of intelligence itself), an area in which they falter.
Guess someone doesn't want to be embarrassed.
I happen to be on Fedora Linux 42 and Windows 11 but my primary OS has been Linux for almost 30 years now.
Idle power consumption under Windows and Linux is exactly the same. Linux doesn't have any magical tricks to make it lower.
Windows has more services running in background but they don't meaningfully affect idle power consumption at all.
The entire Reddit topic confirms my statement, multiple over hundreds of reviews confirm what I said, yet it's
> paired with bad drivers, stupid software and bad peripherals.
It's kinda hard to be an AMD fan when you live in an alternative reality, huh?
The IOD (die) is extremely inefficient for all desktop Zen CPUs as it never truly idles.
I have reasons to believe you're making this up.
Not a single user has seen such low idle power consumption for desktop Zen AMD CPUs.
https://www.reddit.com/r/Amd/comments/1brs42g/amd_please_tac...
I don't bloody care that AMD CPUs seem to be more power efficient than Intel's. For most people their CPUs are completely idle most of the time and Zen CPUs on average idle at 25W or MORE.
Many Zen 4 and Zen 5 owners report that their desktop CPUs idle at 40W or more even without the 3D cache.
Zen APUs have no such issue.
My 7840HS idles at 3W when plugged in and around 0.5W when running on battery power.
And the cracking scene has now to grapple with hellish online activation.
And then many workflows have become sort of professional or moved to the web altogether.
And the younger generation, having received access to gigabytes of RAM and storage, simply couldn't care less about being super lean and fast.
There's really no future for the scene.
> I get the general impression that the AMD CPU has higher power consumption in all regards: the baseline is higher, the spikes are higher (peak consumption) and it spikes more often / for longer.
> Looking at my energy meter statistics, I usually ended up at about 9.x kWh per day for a two-person household, cooking with induction.
> After switching my PC from Intel to AMD, I end up at 10-11 kWh per day.
It's been the bane of desktop AMD CPUs since Zen 1. Hopefully AMD will address this in Zen 6 but I don't have too much hope.
1. Breaks text 2. Cannot fuck up anything
I have no idea why they do it this way. Everything they list must be multiplied by about 1.35.
For example, a 170W TDP CPU requires 230W of dissipation. Not 170W.
AMD fans don't give a damn about that though. "It's just fine" (tm).
I agree with this, yet most of this thread blames OpenAI *alone*.
By the way, I've attempted to commit suicide multiple times over the last five years. Some people even saw me do it. I've talked to ChatGPT extensively about it, and it has tried its best to dissuade me but it didn't convince me at all.
Let me tell you something else: Half of my friends know about it. Has anyone done anything to stop me? No.
Yet here on YC: "BURN OPENAI WITH FIRE, HE'S JUST A KID!"
Anything can become a tool for self-destruction if misused, including ChatGPT.
On the other hand, someone might be held responsible for this, and that's it.
"Might" is the key word here. Given what we've learned, it's difficult to pinpoint who might be responsible.
Imagine if a suicidal person found a book that prompted them to kill themselves.
Would you sue the author for that?
This is exactly what we have here.
But yeah, let's paint ChatGPT responsible. It's always corporations, not whatever shit he had in his life, including and not limited to his genes.
Groupthink has spoken.
No, no, no and no.
ChatGPT wasn't the source of his desire to end his life, nor was it the means to do it. It was a "person" to talk to, since he had no such real people in his life.
Let's absolve everyone else of blame and hold ChatGPT solely responsible. Yeah, right.
Not his genes, upbringing, parents, peers, or school — it's just ChatGPT. Your own attempt at ending your life hasn't seemingly taught you anything.
Looks like Google wants to kill it too.
I cannot quote him because it's private. Kent is also aware of his decision.
Can you name a single thing that you enjoy doing that's outside your genetic code?
> If you view the human being as simply a program that is given a goal to achieve and tools to achieve it with, without any higher order “thought” or “thinking”, then you realise they are simply doing what they are genetically “programmed” to do.
FTFY