614 karma · joined January 25, 2015
For example "Raw capability: Math Index", shows GPT-5.2 as highest. It does not even mention astra, of fable.
IMO This type of exfiltration can happen only from locally running models (which are perhaps already opensourced models), not from a frontier lab.
https://github.com/anderspitman/awesome-tunneling
I have played around with frp, bore and ngrok.
Compare that to Muse spark 1.3
$1.25/M input, $4.25/M output (without data sharing) $0.10/M input, $0.20/M output (with data sharing)
It is dirt cheap, but only if you are willing to share your data with meta and allow them to use it for improving their models and products.
You can use them remotely over SSH connections, and they can survive disconects (within tmux). No VNC, or X11 forwarding needed.
They take less memory. compare vscode vs nvim.
Super fast to launch.
They can integrate with other TUIs and shell apps, shell-scripts, pipes
and lastly they do not contain Ads. lol
Then I tried using it on a raspberry pi 4. Did not work.
This is specifically for 64 bit arm. I see no reason why you could not enable desktops as well? Just a matter of compilation
.con, instead of .com
it is as if developer does not want anyone to use this tool.
Airplanes and many other captive portals will allow DNS traffic, but restrict everything else. Such things can be used to get free internet in such environments. It is indeed an abuse of protocol, and future protocols are going to make life difficult for everyone to prevent such abuse.
I tried using it on a simple svg that i had (around 1KB, just few simple lines and shapes). But it did not rendered them properly. Colors were off (black-box instead of original colors), and in one place it was showing at triangle instead of an L shaped line.
Also when I move an object, a single Cmd+Z wont undo the action. Have to repeat twice for object to go back (I am using Chrome on macbook)
Will it work? Yes. Will it produce same quality as Sonnet or Opus? No.
Closed models are specifically tuned with tools, that model provider wants them to work with (for example specific tools under claude code), and hence they perform better.
I think this will always be the case, unless someone tunes open models to work with the tools that their coding agent will use.
Also it acts as a nice security perimeter. If all IoT devices in a home were exposed to internet, It would be absolute mess.
2. Junior engineer's heavy reliance on AI tools is a problem in itself. AI tools learn from existing code that is written by senior engineers. Too much use of AI by junior engineers will result in deterioration of engineering skills. It will eventually result in AI learning from AI generated code. This is true for most other content as well, as more and more content on internet is AI generated.