3,183 karma · joined September 30, 2012
fool me once, shame on me
fool me twice, you can't fool me again
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8227014/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9776645/
https://github.com/ujh/iomrascalai
it doesn't need unsafe code despite being performance-optimized
If you use `unsafe` you have to make sure of it yourself, but you can easily grep for this keyword and see where the monsters lurk.
* pip is not guaranteed to get you to a working state even if you run the same commands, so don't even think about it
* Cargo for managing dependencies and a sensible module system
* Option/Result based error handling without using null
* Zero (runtime) cost abstractions like iterators and async
Nim doesn't GUARANTEE memory safety, so it's basically... better Pascal? It's an iterative improvement that nobody is getting super excited about. Why is it better than D, V, Delphi?
At the time I worked for intuit, it was Brad Smith, but you could make the case we were BOTH really working for Scott Cook, who IS a billionaire
Nobody accused me of being too lazy to play games
For example, I found a flatpak of a system monitor and thought it was portable. Turns out, it parses `ps` output directly, but it's not compatible with BusyBox `ps` output
https://github.com/hakandundar34coding/system-monitoring-cen...
the author literally doesn't care since it works with coreutils `ps`
it's a culture problem
If I choose to eat a steak with some veggies on the side, where's the egg in that? Where are the beans?
Yesterday I had a pizza. It had no egg or beans on it, just bacon, cheese, pizza crust, tomato, etc.
Buddy, if I knew the answer to the question "something people want to buy" I would be rich already