ioasuncvinvaer

When you program a list of widgets you can program it against anything though. Whether its xml or html.

How is html not data?

But why would a server send me xml instead of html? From the thread you can see that the servers already serve html so why is there a second way to present that content via xslt?

By rendering it on the server and serving it to the client.

So a feature was removed from the spec and it is still supported. I don't see how it would be bad to remove XSLT then?

The google people provided exactly that. A WASM polyfill.

html?

The funny thing is that apple has a huge ad business so I don't know which browser you mean.

I guess sou just have a weird definition of "what a software does" means. Because to it is exactly about the end product.

Why does "caring what a package does" mean that someone is no longer a beginner?

All the people I know care what their software does.

I found that post unconvincing.

> It's very verbose.

This is his example: https://github.com/crdoconnor/strictyaml/blob/master/hitch/s...

I think you shouldn't use yaml or toml for this.

> TOML's hierarchies are difficult to infer from syntax alone

True! The point of TOML is to flatten the hierarchical structures. I would argue your configuration files shouldn't have much nesting anyway.

> Overcomplication: Like YAML, TOML has too many features

Basically TOML has a date type and all associated problems and advantages. I think it's a reasonable thing to include.

> Syntax typing

I think this is a good thing. I want to know whether something is a string or a number.

Even if that is true, the US's proven record does not include the current administration.

username checks out

Thank god the US is the only country in the world.

They post images of the men in question without consent.

What is the argument?

I think the difference is just the amount of people using the technology.

Is there anything new in this article?

A problem that I always run into with code using * for multiplication of matrices is which operation they use. Is it element wise or a matrix multiplication?

It seems to be in active development though? And Google also made go which very much alive.

Except for null terminated strings these don't seem like mayor issues to me. Can you elaborate?

Can you give an example?

I disagree.

It was a bad design choice to allow JSON keys with different capitalisation and to serialise all public struct members by default.

These decisions can easily result in the creation of an insecure system.

How does this check exhaustiveness?

should be close to 3.12

  $
  norm((u_0)_j-hat(u)_j (t=0))_(L^2 TT^d) &<= norm(u_j - hat(u)_j)_(L^2 delta Omega) \
  &<= sqrt(2 max {2h_Omega,d+1} / rho_Omega) norm(u_j - hat(u)_j)_(H^1 (Omega)) \
  &<= sqrt(2 max {2h_Omega,d+1} / rho_Omega) C_(1,k,d+1,u_1) lambda_1 (N) N^(-k+1)
  $

How does it lose type safety?

I was under the impression that bevy's Query system is type safe.

I

How are these interpolated?