intermerda

I don't get this. Why is Musk tweeting a fake quote and why are you posting it? What does it signify?

Did you always have fascist tendencies or did Trump bring them out?

HN and the broader tech community have had their mask off moments.

Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill (ugh..) has already rolled back most of those policies. Additionally DOE and EPA have announced termination of many projects, canceled previously approved funding, banned words such as "climate change", among tons of measures aimed at curbing the progress made.

You, of course, knew that and were being disingenuous.

Or you didn't know what and are simply ignorant.

> Trevor died from liver disease that would have been preventable if he had had access to health care. But until his dying breath, he agreed with the policies that prevented ACA improvements because he did not want his tax dollars to pay for Mexicans or "welfare queens".

The fact is that Apple is saying ICE is a "targeted group" and lays out every single legally protected class along with it. You can look them up if you are unaware.

The fact is that the article backs this point by citing the exact TOS.

You don't care about facts.

> 1.1.1 Defamatory, discriminatory, or mean-spirited content, including references or commentary about religion, race, sexual orientation, gender, national/ethnic origin, or other targeted groups, particularly if the app is likely to humiliate, intimidate, or harm a targeted individual or group. Professional political satirists and humorists are generally exempt from this requirement.

This "ackchyually" behavior from HN is so bizarre.

Then why are the farmers complaining about it? https://www.reuters.com/world/us/us-farm-groups-want-trump-s...

Obama prioritized deportation of people convicted of serious crimes and recent arrivals after they got their day in court. He did not call Mexicans rapists. The admin did not arrest US citizens. Being arrested by the feds even if you did not break the law is a much worse ordeal.

> Most Americans support the idea of deporting people who break our immigration laws, thusly cutting in line while millions of others patiently wait.

The line for legal citizenship does not move faster if you deport more people.

> This really doesn't have to be an emotional issue. Very few Americans support actual open borders. We can't feed, house or provide medical care to the entire world. That is why there is a process.

When masked men come out of a van and kidnap you off the streets in broad daylight, tell me if it's an emotional issue or not.

> Were you this vocal when Obama deported millions, or is this just more "I hate Trump" hot air?

Were you always a fascist sympathizer or did Trump stoke those feelings in you?

Are you intentionally trying to undermine the gravity of this by straw-manning?

> Alito replied, “I agree with you,” when Windsor said people who are conservative Christians need “to return our country to a place of godliness.” He said Windsor was “probably right” when she said, “I don’t know that we can negotiate with the left in the way that needs to happen for the polarization to end. I think that it’s a matter of, like, winning.”

> “One side or the other is going to win,” agreed the justice. “I mean, there can be a way of working—a way of living together peacefully, but it’s difficult, you know, because there are differences on fundamental things that really can’t be compromised. It’s not like you can split the difference.”

If you wanted to be honest you would say this government, not any government.

That's like saying cooking is comparable with stabbing someone because both involve moving a knife back and forth. Give me a break.

What is that policy?

> According to Grok

Why did you ask an LLM which is manipulated by a single person when he doesn't like facts?

> So, we have precedent where four Democratic senators pressured Apple to remove an app that allowed people to evade law enforcement.

Yes, senators sent letters to several companies. Apple listened. What would have happened if it didn't? What would happen to Apple if they don't listen now?

Do you sincerely believe that both situations are comparable?

You have been brainwashed by the conservative propaganda machine.

Lee Atwater would be proud. It started with Reagan and is used with exceptional effectiveness by the current Republican Party.

I'm not agreeing or disagreeing with the study, just pointing out the table. In fact, it kind of me of the Texas Sharpshooter Fallacy - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Texas_sharpshooter_fallacy#Exa....

This is not true. Multiple studies have shown that the vaccines significantly reduced infection rates.

> however it was mandated for everyone to take it, even strong young people with no comorbidities that had already been infected.

This is not true as well. Plenty of places around the world where it wasn't mandated. If you have a specific region in mind, do you mind elaborating? Are you talking about Korea?

> I know people who were otherwise healthy and got diagnosed with cancer after the Covid19 pandemic, everyone suspected it was related to the vaccines and it is now being proven by medical studies.

"My granddad smoked cigarettes. He died at 95. Hit by a truck."

Good thing that you prefaced with that you're not an American and you try not to wade into it too much. Your have a good excuse for ignorance of drone strikes and are a great example of how manufactured consent works. "Obama" + "drones" eventually leads to "both sides" enlightened centrism without understanding policy nuances. Just one such example - https://www.jstor.org/stable/23526906?seq=8.

> It's not unanswerable, but it is impossible to have a reasoned discussion about it even with otherwise reasonable people, sadly.

You're right about that one.

You racists really want all the "benefits" of racism without actually accepting the label. Why is that?

It's not a "card", it's reality. And you make it sound like there is something wrong with being emotional.

It's neither politics nor getting back to the law's original intent. It is red meat for wolves like you and others in this thread.

Nice strawman.

> The democrats went too far left which is why they lost.

The democrats lost because they underestimated the stupidity and overestimated the decency of the American public. They are so bad at politics that they couldn't even prevent half the country to stop supporting a pedophile - you included.