1,043 karma · joined January 6, 2021
If money is speech, does it mean cash is protected by the 1A?
They are all subject to the same regs, and most credit unions aren't any better than large banks.
They'll just pressure all businesses not to accept your crypto.
Just the airlines, banks, any payment processor, any gold bullion dealers, any supermarkets, any restaurants, any car rentals, any car dealers. Probably can be done in less than 10 lines of regulation. Nobody is going to risk jail for your crypto.
What then? You are going to invent some tech that will somehow make totalitarian government impossible?
That pressure is already there in many subtle ways.
It's almost like there is an approved list of causes/entities that are pre-approved for unlimited amounts of foreign funding.
That signal has been getting less and less reliable for a few decades at this point, even at the highest levels.
You won't find honest men there at high noon with a flashlight.
Sure, honest men exist, but they don't have any real power or influence, and the congress doesn't care about their opinion: https://www.upworthy.com/20-years-of-data-reveals-that-congr...
Assuming everything is biased isn't despair. That's just the natural state of the world, and an axiom that has served me well.
Semper bonus homo tiro est.
Editorial slant is very real.
It's an unachievable idea.
Maybe, if someone is being viciously attacked by both sides, then maybe, just maybe ~10%, or so, of what they say is unbiased, but it's still hard to disentangle that apart from the wrong/incorrect/biased other things they said.
The crucial question, is this the party in power, or not.
In case of Oregon, this appears to be solidly Democrats, not Republicans.
In the incident described in the article, Ontario is governed by the Ontario Conservative Party, and so for the comparison to be valid, it would have to be against a governing party, in case of Oregon that to be Democrats.
Did any Democrat in Oregon fire any staffers, or similar, that donated to BLM? Militants that allied themselves with BLM have murdered people, which AFAIK is something far beyond anything truckers have done.
I have not heard about any donors to BLM being fired over that, and if such precedent exists but for some reason was not widely covered, please post examples, tia.
He calls it techno-feudalism.
What are your thoughts on that?
Definitely a hack.
Besides, opening unlocked doors can still get you charged with break and entry, or in this case, unauthorized access.
It's perfectly legal, and it is very much a regular occurrence.
David Suzuki Foundation at some point received over 50% of its funding from foreign sources.
Quite honestly, the common attitude around this whole foreign funding is "I don't want foreign money funding causes I personally don't like".
Everyone is an internationalist, until that becomes personally inconvenient, in this case politically.
Have there been any Democrat staffers fired over donations to BLM?
P.S.
As a working class protest over conditions of employment, one could even frame this into a typical socialist strike type of thing, if it were politically profitable. Some of the left persuasion even worry that this sets precedent for extra-judicial strike funds seizures in the future.
I don't even know how "return to normalcy" (probably the shortest way to summarize the convoy's demands) is right or left, it is quite sad that we are discussing such basic concepts on the basis of blue-red spectrum.
Ontario has a conservative government, and the federal conservative party supported the convoy to some degree, and a few MPs met with truckers.
This would be similar to Democrats firing someone for donating to BLM.
Is there such precedent?
The payment processor was hacked as well, and all payment data, including card data was leaked.
Amazingly, the entire 5GB archive was made available to journalists for "research", who then began promptly dialing everyone for "comments".
Twitter refuses to this day to take down tweets that include personal data, despite their policy on hacked data.
is there a long form write up on what ivnmeta did wrong? I couldn't find any, just comments here and there that, and instead of picking who to trust, it might be better if there is a long form going over what exactly and how they did wrong/incorrectly/deceptively.
I assumed they were just cherry-picking studies, but not faking conclusions.
Now, the city bus service in Ottawa, also has heavy tows, that can pull a double-decker bus, or a semi tractor.
They could've been doing this a long time ago.....but they didn't.
Why? They had all the tools.
None whatsoever.
Pretty much every business in deep-liberal cities at this point simply ignores restrictions.
What mandate? Seems like there wasn’t one in the first place.
Rather weak mandate.
Ottawa residents aren’t forced to live in that city.
Europe is opening up. I guess Science different in Canada.
Abacus never fails to find support for government approved narratives.
They’ve just performatively asked truckers to leave, so that they can always point to that later in their election campaign. Why would they want them to leave?they don’t.