218 karma · joined October 31, 2017
It is still winner takes all, but if you look at the overall landscape, there are plenty of opportunities where you can have an outsized impact - you can have localized fame and fortune (anyone with AI expertise under their belt have no problems with fortune!)
int* foo(int bar) {
int* return_value = NULL;
__cleanup__((cleanup_1)) int c1 = 0;
if (!do_something(bar))
return NULL;
__cleanup__((cleanup_2)) int c2 = 0;
if (!init_stuff(bar))
return NULL;
__cleanup__((cleanup_3)) int c3 = 0;
if (!prepare_stuff(bar))
return NULL;
return_value = do_the_thing(bar);
return return_value;
}It won’t be surprising if there is a huge defense spending bill in congress with carve out for war in Ukraine and this time it will go through as the Republicans won’t hold back.
In order to achieve this, we are destroying the environment, other species and their habitats.
> but what is the alternative to blind progress being proposed
You don’t need and ethicist for this - but an accountant. We need to get stricter about negative externalities. For example, every inventor/manufacturer should be forced to take back their product after end of life. This will slow progress but if done right, it will avoid destruction brought by technology or at least not palm it off on to poorer society or environment.