4,698 karma · joined January 18, 2010
ap [at] amandapeyton [dot] com
2. $0.50 a day is WAY too expensive.
3. Is your goal to be a curator or a creator? This seems like you want to be a curator, but what makes you so sure that your newsletter is going to be so much better than my hand-picked group of people on Twitter that I would pay $15/month for it? That is more expensive than Netflix, Rdio, Pandora, Dropbox, etc. not to mention free curation services like Flipboard, news.me (recently made free), etc.
4. What I found - people don't want to pay for content. Period. I had, over the course of 6 months, around 100 people subscribe to my paid letter.ly newsletter ($2/month, btw), while around 30,000 people visit my blog. It made me realize that it's more important to have an audience than it is to have some short-term cash. That said, I am not sure if the same necessarily applies to curators.
5. IMO, the rewards are much better if you are "known" as a curator vs. "paid" to be a curator.
Best of luck, though. Interested to see what happens!
Background: I had a paid email newsletter through the service letter.ly for around 6 months from July-December 2010. I have also had an on-and-off blog since March 2009.
Disclosure: I am female.
Do you have plans to integrate with services like Flickr, Instagram, etc?
Background: http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2011/05/12/facebook-bu...
It is just too malicious and meticulously done to constitute a random crime (do I watch too many crime shows? maybe.) AirBnB just closed a gigantic $100m round and they are doing phenomenally well, and here comes someone who makes "everyone's worst fears" about lending out their apartment to a stranger come true.
I think what some people forget is that there are only about 500K iphone apps in the app store (about the same for Android? not sure on that), and the store is barely three years old. Over the next few years I bet that number is going to explode, providing a huge opportunity for a service like app.net.
Blatant copying looks more like the Plurk v. Microsoft situation from December 2009: http://techcrunch.com/2009/12/14/microsoft-plurk-ripoff/.
Pixel for pixel copying = lame, feature overlap = necessary.
I bought my mother a third-party device for her television so she could stream Netflix last Christmas only to find out that Closed Captioning wasn't supported. It was pretty depressing - she couldn't use it at all because she is hearing impaired.
There's a reason why there are laws in place for compliance - often times good business strategy and "accessibility for all" don't align.
A lot of small businesses have cash flow issues. Daily deals sites propose to give extra liquidity in exchange for something your business is already offering. Seems like a great deal until you realize that the fees are egregious. And daily deal site fees ARE just as egregious, but they do a better job of marketing themselves/their fees.
Running a daily deal is great for a lot of businesses, but in many cases the cost to the business is much, much higher than advertised.
I think it's obvious when someone is truly passionate about something versus just doing it because they think it will get them another carrot.
Is it possible, though, to have a functional society where everyone follows his or her passion? I believe it is, but would be curious to hear thoughts.