635 karma · joined September 6, 2016
>>> As someone working for AWS, better uptime, lower costs, and higher feature throughput. How about justifying return to office with hard numbers showing that we've fallen short on those points instead of just handwaving that "it's better"
This is the most logical argument I have read on this post. Surely forcing a decent percentage even if not majority to come to office would not improve productivity. I have seen most water cooler talks which are just gossiping and not about the aha breakthrough you stumble upon when talking to a co-worker.I have heard M Sipser's book is also good but have not gone through it myself.
However there are quite a few topics where you could be objective - sports scores, election results, new releases etc.
Good luck. Hope to see it on Show HN one day.
Microsoft had one of the greatest comeback. Just wondering if Oracle and IBM are capable of this ever.
Freakonomics : https://freakonomics.com/
Dan Snow's HistoryHit : https://www.historyhit.com/podcast/dan-snows-history-hit/
Extra careful to cover all cases is when I start looking at alternatives. In this case it is not even enhancing readability. Even if you may be an excellent programmer think whether your team can be that extra careful most of the times before introducing these quirks in your code.
And even if trees are not there won't grass/dust/pollen from plant flowers cause the allergy problem.
I can think of a couple of advanced civilizations which developed in warmer climes immediately (Indus valley and Egyptian). Would like to believe climate contributed much lesser (unless extreme like Tundras) to advancement of civilization vs other factors - easier transport/availability of water/natural resources.
[1] https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2018/aug/25/snakes-flori...