2,746 karma · joined January 29, 2013
"Law enforcement should anticipate that criminals will leverage technological innovations to gain profit and influence," the report says. "Law enforcement should also continue to contribute to policy change related to the privacy of personal information, artificial intelligence, the Internet of Things, quantum computing, digital ledger technology and more."”
Reductive and rude phrasing.
Anyone have a recommendation on conducting fabric for RF isolation as briefly mentioned in the article or resources on the subject of rf isolation/Faraday cages for microcontrollers?
https://spark-public.s3.amazonaws.com/startup/lecture_slides...
We can deflect saying "Anyone who knows a bit about recommendation systems", blame my use of the platform or play these off as a technical problem but imo it seems like Google and the other tech companies know exactly what they are doing in these use cases and are just cynically deploying this content with the culture war filter on because they know it makes the most money. I think when people ascribe political leanings to tech companies that maybe the mean belief of their employee's but as an org it is not the standard opined ultra left havens.
I have been confused recently with the moving best practices. What is the server architecture Next.js is most often plugged into?
One example of a grocery store being held liable for unknowingly selling a pre-prepared item that caused illness is the case of In Re: King Soopers Listeria Outbreak Litigation. In this case, a number of people became ill with listeriosis, a serious and potentially life-threatening bacterial infection, after consuming pre-packaged deli meats sold at various King Soopers grocery store locations in Colorado.
The outbreak was traced back to contaminated meat produced by a third-party supplier, and a number of people filed lawsuits against King Soopers alleging that the store was liable for selling the contaminated meat. The lawsuits alleged that King Soopers had a duty to ensure that the food it sold was safe for consumption and that it had breached that duty by selling the contaminated meat.
The case ultimately settled for an undisclosed sum, with King Soopers agreeing to compensate those who became ill as a result of consuming the contaminated meat.
This case illustrates how grocery stores can be held liable for selling pre-prepared food items that cause illness, even if the store was unaware of the contamination at the time of sale. It also highlights the importance of ensuring that food safety measures are in place throughout the supply chain, from the producers of the food to the stores that sell it to the public.