iab

I appreciate your candor (and your article)

Are you actually euler_angles, or are you really tait_bryan_angles

"...it goes against OpenAI use policy. (Brown)"

I wrote a detailed proof years before Mikolov on Twitter, but the 280 characters were too small to contain it

Very subjective, but having a weight-tracker for weights is very motivating. Kinda gamifies it as well.

Are you the kind of person who loves to track/measure things?

Noted deep learning expert bill gates

Letter Q really having a glow-up this month

Does the set of all flagged posts include a post that lists all flagged posts

> more and more tech professionals are looking east. Way, way east. Over-an-ocean > east. To Europe. > The most well-known is Instagram chief Adam Mosseri, who attempted a London relocation late last year. While he may not have lasted long

LOL

Not the first time I’ve heard this combination of prediction + person

Look forward to seeing it

He meant making in the medium hundreds of thousands : 1/N millions, where N is low. I have never heard anyone describe income this perversely

I can't help but think that is almost the default at large airports. A350, A330, 787, 767, 747, etc. etc. Special liveries - absolutely. Widebody - not really.

I love the plane, but what makes a 777 a "fun" aircraft?

Also always amazed at the robustness of the systems built by AI in the physical space in these hypotheticals.

Notice how I said "one", not "you"? Also at the end of the post, when I said:

> I agree with you

where that is "you", and not "one"?

I find it fascinating that you are doing exactly what you accuse me of, where you are assuming things that are not true. This generally happens (in my experience) where people are unable to disassociate their opinions from their "self", and here I am making a direct inference that this applies to you as well.

Happy to continue the discussion, although it seems you might be unable to split emotions from logic.

It was crystal clear to you. Now imagine someone with diametrically opposed views - they also have an interpretation that is crystal clear.

Instead of a honey-trap, it’s a money-trap

“I authorize burn now, good luck everybody else!”

Happy to see this reach it's natural conclusion, in terms of subscribing to moral relativism. I think if this is one's worldview, it's hard to not use a "whataboutism" style of argument whenever questions of morals or ethics arise. Without a strong internal grounding, it's challenging not to resort to comparisons, I agree with you.

It’s morally acceptable, and correct, to criticize both. Does this make sense? Feels strange asking this, because it is so obviously apparent, but I feel the need to given your response.

Classic whataboutism.

What is god factorial

Is the CEO-to-worker ratio of 398.8 not a moral issue? Hard to take the morality argument seriously here.

> without being able to replicate the results

Not really failure to replicate if the conditions are different.

I think it’s too expensive to build a dam there

STOP THE COUNT

But what’s the downside

Triangulation -> trilateration