hxugufjfjf

I did both. Still round.

Update: I figured it out. The article’s snippet has no selector. As rendered it’s just { border-radius: 0px !important; }, which is invalid CSS and gets ignored (the * was probably eaten by the blog’s formatting). Use:

* { border-radius: 0px !important; }

We’re just getting denied from CVP time and time again by a robot with no explanation as to why. No human support exists at Anthropic so no way to appeal properly.

Do you think they will recommend you things that do not work well?

I agree. Working in cybersecurity, I think I've been able to actually use Opus 5.5 maybe once or twice without triggering safeguards. I can't even discuss findings from a report, or ask for language help on work related text, so its damn near useless for me.

This is how you get banned. I recommend being careful. While OpenAI will often let you do these things, they'll suddenly send you a sharp email saying you are breaching ToS. If you then trigger safeguards once more, its the ban hammer. Losing access permanently to Codex made me feel like a second range citizen ever since.

Yeah, the redditification of HN is ripe in these AI related threads.

One thing I quickly learned when I got into GCP was that you must absolutely not try to use that interface. If it can’t be done with the CLI, it’s best to just close the computer and go outside instead.

Yes, many times.

Pretty reasonable assumption these days unfortunately.

Am I supposed to select the "right" answer or what I would actually answer? Is there some kind of point to this? Either way it’s way too slow even at 2x so I quit after a few questions of not getting it correct (I think?)

Sounds lovely. Wish I had that kind of discipline!

What do you mean?

Eeeeh not the best example maybe?

I don’t think I’ve ever seen otherwise reasonable people go completely unhinged over anything like they do with Opus

What an uncharitable take

Oh boy, every example reads like a HN comment!

That only lasts for a few minutes until it’s locked and you can no longer delete after that.

Agreed. Its so tedious that the top comment section on every HN post the last six months is "this seems be written by LLM" with a bunch of back and forth on whether it is or not.

You’re missing the point. It’s not a witch hunt, but rather a discussion on whether things are too quickly attributed to be AI generated.

Is this what perfection looks like?

You’d never say that if you’ve been on the inside of a mainframe DB2. shudders

Because they (apparently) keep a bunch of secret features and roadmap details in said source code.

You can still use Claude Code with API-only.

Agreed, as proven quite brutally over the last two weeks and especially the last three days.

None that we know of, just like we didn’t know of the attack on xz until we did.

I talk to it like I talk to my coworkers. If I’m nice it/they are usually nice back. Maybe it doesn’t matter if I say please but I don’t overthink it and just treat it like any other chat. I consider it a good habit to just always be calm and respectful, not for the machine’s sake but for my own.

Maybe you’re conflating Claude with clawdbot? Either way, both can be used for good and evil. Would you make the same argument about knives being a huge net negative?

I think the idea is that security scanners ran by companies like Wiz and Aquasec etc will pick this up in that timeframe, not that you sit around and wait for others to get compromised.

Don't think so much about learning Vim itself. Learn vi(m) motions and apply them everywhere. Look for software that supports those vi keybindings, for example Vimium in the browser or the vim keybindings plugin for VSCode if that is something you use. You'll arguably be faster at navigating a computer in general, and if not, you can still get enjoyment of how fast you'll feel. If you decide to go down this route, check out vimtutor.

Cool project! Would you be willing to share the source code?