Also this is amazing, making serious effort towards AGI is what we need. We'll play with RNNs configurations for a long time, but I think it's a good call to fund people who think about the broad picture.
620 karma · joined March 31, 2011
Also this is amazing, making serious effort towards AGI is what we need. We'll play with RNNs configurations for a long time, but I think it's a good call to fund people who think about the broad picture.
But is it really 100$ so expensive for an average developer? Consider how much money you're making because you have these tools.
1. I upload a video 2. Jukedeck finds me the perfect audio for it.
The fact that you needed to make your own kernel and configure a lot of things on your own made me learn a lot about Linux and GNU. Much more than debian or redhat. There is great value in that I think.
Sadly this doesn't happen sometimes as people still don't upgrade, but most do which is fine for me. I hope it stays that way.
As for crashes, that's pretty bad to be sure, but I didn't see the OP try filling a bug-report.
They need to match our platform.
What I'm trying to argue is that it kind of works for us even in the most aggressive situations: If you bomb me I bomb you.
If one AI is super-aggressive then others could decide to stop it.
If it wants to convert all matter for making paper clips other AIs would say: I don't want to be a paper clip and actually have the power to do something about it. Where as us.. we'd be powerless.
In the case where all band against us, well.. we'd have many problems.
All of this to say that developing one single super-human AI in a box is worse in my opinion.
Thanks for your work.
If I publish my project on github and use gb with it, then people who want to contribute have to install gb as well.
Do you think that in the future there is a chance to do the building of a gb project without the gb itself?
It's early for me to tell, but looks like gb is something like a mix between a gvm (virtual env) and godep (vendorizing).
I'm skeptical about things like "don't use the standard, use my thing", but I will try it anyway.
I was able to use Google Maps and didn't have that 'roaming' feeling associated with it. It was amazing!
I'm somebody who was part of this affirmative action population. I come from the poorest country in Europe called Moldova, the unemployment is high, education low, your typical eastern-european anti-intelectual culture, you get the idea.. Anyway.. when I was 15 I got a scholarship in Romania because there were quotas for us 'moldavians'. At the time Romania was not much better off than Moldova, but certainly when it comes to math and CS to me at least it looked years ahead of the programs we had in Moldova! So I packed my bags and left for a much better education and what I would say now without reservation: a better life. Looking back I think I was very lucky to have gotten the education and exposure to an environment with great teachers/programmers. Maybe I could have succeeded in Moldova, who knows.. It's possible I suppose, but unlikely.
Do you think that any amount of positive discrimination is harmful for a given population?
Also working hard to better yourself is a continuous process and it doesn't stop when you get hired at BigCorp, continue doing so and you'll get results no matter your gender.
http://www.amazon.fr/Mining-The-Sky-Asteroids-Planets/dp/020...
If anyone is curious:
Stats from GA so far: 1h first page on HN == 600 page views, 11 extension installs and 1 in total comment.
Is it going to accomplish this goal? No idea..
As long as you don't publish the specs of your net you should be fine I guess.
I've been using it in Alpha and it's really the best DB client I touched since Sequel Pro.
It's not possible to train their service with your data, unlike wit.ai for example. Seems obvious to me that people would want to train with their own data.
AI is one of the hardest problems facing us so doing things we so notoriously bad at like estimating the difficulty of a such problems will not get us any results.
I encourage skepticism and careful research as opposed to ignorance and fear-mongering.
On that note why was not Lecun's FAIR project not on front-page HN? Instead we have this shit... Is there any hope that we'll grow up?
What I found quite annoying lately (more than usual) is that there is a lot of "what if machines, terminator, bla bla bla death! destruction!".
I'm not sure if it's the recent developments with the deep neural nets, maybe it is.. Maybe it's the high profile neo-luddites like Hawkins or Musk. I wish I could have a megaphone and shout: AI that would be classified as having comparable human intelligence is way too far and there are a lot of pieces missing. Just because we can identify with 95.4% accuracy some MNIST dataset or 200 species of dogs, or some guys playing baseball, it's still a long way to getting to a working AGI.
But instead on focusing on doing the actual work that would get us to these machine 'thugs' or at least promoting more research in that direction most prefer to sit in their armchair and argue to the death the hypothetical T-1000.
Thankfully there are smart people out there doing real work and getting results so that is reassuring.
My problem with these extremists is that they produce hype. Hype that got us the AI research winter last time.
They had lots of children, overpopulation was not a problem because of huge habitats that hosted billions of individuals (and that were built with relative ease - The Player of Games). Also I don't agree with the intellectual degradation argument, it's just silly in the Culture AGI context.
Whatever the value of life I think it's best for the individual to decide what to do with it. Most would probably euthanasiate after a while anyway. I would very much prefer suicide than a random age related problem, but I don't really have a choice do I?
The area is: golang, python and js mostly.
alex @plugaru org
p.s. I speak russian.