hugo1789

Yes they are. You can easily see it as the sponge keeps its form, whereas the melamine one shrinks on every use.

That would be so much worse. Code written that doesn't work, SQL that couldn't be parsed, ...

Yes it does, it matters a lot. With smaller dimensions, tip speeds remain manageable. As soon as parts of the thing get supersonic, everything gets much more complicated.

Seems to me like a migration that should have been done 15 years ago.

Maybe but still a little better than closed source like Windows. Everytime whem someone asked me if I could hack my way into his Windows PC I always told "After all it's Windows, how bad can it be?" Doing that since 25 years still waiting for a Windows machine that doesn't open... On the other hand I failed to open about 50% of Apple Devices I was asked to open and about 10% of Linux machines. (Not because Linux is insecure by itself but because most Linux distros install with insecure defaults and users don't care.)

I think RPKI is good enough. As we have TLS on top it doesn't need to be perfect.

Since revocation is also a big pain.

No I would not. They posed no immediate danger to anyone of us until that attack.

At least it's more interesting than all those AI stuff.

That also changed somehow... LTO-10 drives are not backward compatible and can only read/write LTO-10 media.

That is a critical observation. Last time I had to root an Android device it hat pretty robust defenses like dm-verity and strict SELinux policies (correctly configured) and then everything collapsed because the system loaded a exfat kernel module from an unverified filesystem.

Permitting user-loaded kernel modules effectively invalidates all other security measures.

What’s the alternative—locking down all legitimate users and still losing the data anyway?

Network controls alone don’t stop exfiltration. HDMI/DP can move data faster than most consumer NICs. Does the system account for that scenario?

What is not only true for police but for every sufficiently big group of people.

Could you please stop that? First it is not true. "Open Source" has nothing to do with the "Open Source Initiative" it existed long before. Second you are making people keep their source closed (not available) which is not a good thing.

I think mandatory S/MIME without user-friendly key management would either be reverted pretty soon or it would kill Gmail.

I think he would attempting a landing despite the issue in most cases because running out of fuel during go-around would be worse.

Too late, switched to DBeaver Community some months ago and it works too well for me to switch back again.

Maybe because xen is a type 1 hypervisor in its original meaning and all the other ones are type 2? (yes, ESX(i) doesn't use linux but it also brings its own os on which it runs on top)

And debug many tools which still ignore the fact that malloc could fail.

That works if there is enough memory after the "bad" process has been killed. The question is, is it necessary? Many systems can live with processes performing a little bit poorly for some minutes and I wouldn't do it.

Imo that's a pretty complicated topic. On one side if you just build LWRs you just don't need very highly enriched uranium or plutonium so posession of those is a red flag. On the other side fast breeder reactors are the ones which are able to produce the least harmful waste. But fast breeders and closed fuel cycles produce and handle plutonium which in turn can be used for bad things.

Linux kernel image or another stage of bootloader loaded by the GPU is pretty normal in mobile SOCs like the one that is used here. At least they did not enable secure boot so that it's still possible to execute something else.

Why another WinApps instead of contributing and fix problems there?

I still remember how we installed Windows PCs at home if no media with the latest service pack was available. Install Windows, download service pack, copy it away, disconnect from internet, throw away everything and install Windows again...

I don't think that fits MS Office. The situation is more that you have a working, usable word processor which has all the festures your user needs. Since many years ago. But your UI designer thinks it can be a little more beautiful but much slower. Of course you give that way too much priority.

On my Laptop where I am forced by my company to run windows, I run word 2010 and it runs far better(speed and stability) that the newest word I have to use ob my office pc.

Doesn't work to search serious things. If I search a new car and enter "new car fuck" I get "Hard fuck in new car video". Using the "web" tab (what udm=14 does) works better.

Nice but where is the code? Is it just very, very incomplete or a joke?

Why so complicated? Wine is cool if you need to run an existing binary but when you're writing your own software, why not just compile the platform independent part into a binary and make the platform dependent part a little library (open-source)?

It seems that are used books

This is the new design: https://www.amazon.com/-/de/gp/aw/d/1621050521/