27 karma · joined October 15, 2021
I am annoyed by such arguments because crypto has now existed for quite a long time, and the positives are very limited if existent at the moment. Would you mind sharing positive events occurring thanks to crypto?
Regarding society, I am worried about people consuming content generated by an AI just for them. We have seen how recommended content polarises political views, I can only see it becoming worse. Imagine Russian propaganda agencies powered by AI-generated content, they will just have to type: "A young black man mugging an old white lady" or whatever would be the most triggering.
> The few cases where humans interact will, like dialing 911, only be done on an emergency basis, .
To be honest, seeing the current trend of public services funding, I would rather put this service at the very top of the list of services that will be automated.
[1] https://waterfootprint.org/en/water-footprint/product-water-...
[0] https://www.un.org/sg/en/content/secretary-generals-statemen...
There are many flaws in this argument: - what about people without degrees but skills, do they deserve such a job? - Is university free? If not, do poor people deserve such a job?
Finally, we are not talking about the average SE job. We are talking about the top 10% of the jobs where competition is fierce. People at this level, as in any domain, are willing to compete fiercely. Should the marathon been shortened to 10k so that people who can't train can compete?
> Who is more likely to enjoy abstract puzzles/quizzes?
Assuming someone doesn't, is programming a good fit? (genuinely asking)