htilford

Safari issues are rare (if it works in Chrome it pretty much works in Safari). IE issues on the other hand . . . which is why when I'm doing serious web development where I care about reaching all users, I prefer to use windows so I can quickly debug Chrome, Firefox and IE(s).

> ¿how do you use results from the first function on the second or third?

waterfall

  async.waterfall([
    function (cb) {
      . . .
      cb(stuff);
    },
    function (stuff, cb) {
      . . .

The installation failed.

The Installer encountered an error that caused the installation to fail. Contact the software manufacturer for assistance.

10.8.4

OS X, Widows 8, Ubuntu Server, Chrome OS, Android in no particular order

@Home Acer Aspire S7 @Work Macbook Pro 15" retina @Both Chromebook Pixel

It's not about language, it's about the module ecosystem. Less Node.js vs Ruby vs Python more npm vs gem vs pip

Mozilla is already running Persona free at scale. If they let WebRTC do most the heavy lifting I don't see why they would have any issues running TowTruck free at scale.

I've been using https://github.com/chjj/tty.js/ to vim on my pixel, with tty.js running on my linode.

Can't we all just get along: http://tjanczuk.github.com/edge/#/

Ensighten

Location: Cupertino, CA (or remote) REMOTE, H1B

Multiple full time positions (http://ensighten.com/company/careers)

Senior UI Developer Cloud Infrastructure Engineer / Administrator VP Client Success Javascript Developer Android Developer Systems Administrator IT Engineer

http://blog.limaconsulting.com/2012/uncategorized/ensighten-...

izs mentioned @tacoconf that he wanted to get people to switch to 0.8.x @nodeconf

Ensighten, Cupertino CA

Multiple Fulltime local positions

http://ensighten.com/company/careers

by default nodetime reports back to nodetime.com to display the results. But that's just the default. It can be set to report to any server and/or the console.

Yes, Nacl supports JIT. Mozilla could port Firefox to Nacl so it could run a Chromebook.

not without it's usual validation which makes it non trivial to implement.

I don't think 'better' is the right question. Their's room for multiple frameworks. To answer the question I think Meteor's strong suit is live coding for rapid prototyping.

it's likely only 1000 lines of less, sass, scss, or stylus which can be well organized into modules and output compressed css if bandwidth is a concern. It would also be possible to only deliver the css applicable to the user's browser (the vast majority of the lines are redundancies due to vendor prefixes). I don't see it being the case that you couldn't optimize the file size down to about the same size as the equivalent jQuery animation.

They'll always be able to get in. Which isn't a problem. The problem is buisness guys outnumbering technical guys. Reducing their numbers is all that's required.

The worst part is that they all end up showing their multicore program is faster than a single threaded node program. I haven't seen a single one use cluster.

My favorite is actually the back swipe on the Veer (WebOS). It's a left moving swipe on the bottom bevel. It took me a little while to realize it existed, but now that I've learned it it's a joy to use.

How long did you wait for your ride? How long would you have had to wait for an alternative ride? What's your time and comfort worth?

I'll assume you knew what the base price was, and where willing to pay that. Where was your maximum price that would cause you to find an alternative ride?

Interesting questions don't have definitive answers.

Found an IE 7 bug in less than a minute <3

hook.io isn't about client server communication. It's about seamless mesh communication with high fault tolerance. The browser is just another end point.

> tiny-web-servers-only networking library

really?

Chromeos isn't about offering more features. It's about offering less problems.

I use Google+ at least 10 times each day on my Chromebook (series 5). It's a touch slow, but hardly unusable.

It's the flash slowdowns that bother me occasionally, but even there it's rarely unusable.

Netflix is a native app on the Chromebook, written in C.

If JavaScript is such junk why hasn't any other language displaced it?

What part of JSON isn't a subset of JavaScript?

"JSON is a subset of the object literal notation of JavaScript. Since JSON is a subset of JavaScript, it can be used in the language with no muss or fuss." http://www.json.org/js.html

'huge chuck' is an understatement. Windows is the majority OS.