304 karma · joined August 26, 2008
construction equipment for park improvements (backhoe, etc)
gas powered moped
electric moped
gas powered rc car
4-wheeler/atv/dune buggy
golf cart
segway/monowheel
antique cars for some kind of demo/event
shriner guys in those mini cars in a local parade (at least i think most americans know what i'm talking about)
anti-drunk driving display (they have these sometimes at colleges, and maybe high schools, but it's basically a wrecked car and there are police there to do pr)
Note: i think many of your options are just clearly not covered by the rule, maybe keep some of them but not so many?
No idea if it's any good.
No idea if it's any good.
"Our primary aim is to protect individuals from coming to physical harm as a result of their information being shared ..."
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=loylqtvKAbU
It would seem to make this case very clear. Right?
"7. Twitter’s decision was, at least, more clearly explained. The site has rules against publishing hacked information, it’s used these rules to ban links before, and copying personal files from a laptop without permission — if that’s indeed how they were obtained — arguably falls under them. Twitter later elaborated on its decision, saying the Post story included “personal and private information — like email addresses and phone numbers — which violate our rules.”
"Twitter said the article was in violation of its hacked material policy. The company clarified that it was banning links to the article because it contained images of hacked material with personal and private information."
"Twitter also said the Post article contained images that included personal and private information such as email addresses and phone numbers, which is against the social network's rules. "
Weird seeing disinfo get upvoted on Hacker News of all places.