The only "downside" is no Windows VMs, but they don't seem to care about that.
7 karma · joined January 12, 2025
The only "downside" is no Windows VMs, but they don't seem to care about that.
"The government of Columbia has agreed to all of President Trump's terms, including the unrestricted acceptance of all illegal aliens from Colombia returned from the United States, including on U.S. military aircraft, without limitation or delay. Based on this agreement, the fully drafted IEEPA tariffs and sanctions will be held in reserve, and not signed, unless Colombia fails to honor this agreement. The visa sanctions issued by the State Department, and enhanced inspections from Customs and Border Protection, will remain in effect until the first planeload of Colombian deportees is successfully returned. Today's events make clear to the world that America is respected again. President Trump will continue to fiercely protect our nation's sovereignty, and he expects all other nations of the world to fully cooperate in accepting the deportation of their citizens illegally present in the United States.".
What Purism offers with its Pureboot and hardware security chip that enforces deemed-tolerable ME payload is sufficient enough for our ask.
.
> Are there any modern Intel systems that can
The lack of availability of a product does not change the desire for the product to exist. RISC-V is already successfully playing in a market space with products that satisfy my asks above, maybe Intel can catch up some day.
.
> clients' needs,
Our clients came to us and were clear about what their ask was. I'm kind of chuckling right now, because one of clients in particular, if he saw your post would shoot back with "it's not called the Bill of Needs".
Some of the other ones are government. But I appreciate you trying to be helpful.
And I want one or two for myself too, sans the backdoors...
Put an OpenBSD machine to act as a router/firewall between supplied devices and your own network to keep things clean.
- where can I set machine-owner-key for rEFInd to do secure boot with Linux?
- where can I set the *real* machine-owner-key to load only a copy of board firmware compiled from not-license-encumbered source code on a machine I control?
- can I remove the wireless network interface so that I have a wireless network interface that does not run binary blobs?
- is there a clean interface to remove the Intel Management Engine binary blob and replace it with something that I can see the code so don't need to worry about something opaque and untrusted having "ring -3" access to my system?
I feel like I already know the answers to these questions. But these are questions anyone who has one of these machines should be asking themselves..
> Is this a use case for Torrents?
Yes, provided you have a good way to dynamically append a distributed index of torrents and users willing to run that software in addition to the torrent software. Should be easy enough to define in container-compose.
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/trump-very-fine-people/ https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/trump-very-fine-people/The college educated person -- but not the university educated STEM degree holder -- takes these three things to mean what they are labeled as at face value.
If you could elaborate on this further, I and others are probably very interested in reading more about it.
It'd be really convenient for me, well not me but others, if we could tell our customers this. However, those of us running DBaaS do have to offer an actual no-downtime upgrade.
https://github.com/postgresml/pgcatThe analysts, analysts who do not code, analysts who don't run GPU clouds, are wrong.
The anals are wrong.
As someone with 20+ years experience in IT/DevOps/Cloud/whatever, I disagree.
They would simply need to actually use the security that is already there. Data leaks that happen due to lack of "very good security" are extremely rare. In almost every case, someone was doing something very stupid that everyone already agrees is a very obvious thing to not do.
.
> In fact companies would go out of their way to not store any of your data.
The companies that already use existing IT systems, as they are already designed to be used, have no problem protecting customer data and not leaking it. The companies that can not properly hire our outsource competent IT people shouldn't be storing data in the first place. Commerce is subject to regulation, due to human nature, and different regulation is needed today.
.
> and insurance to cover themselves in case they do lose your data
I would prefer that this kind of insurance not exist.
Personally, I'm not among them, but I don't lean into "Orange Man is Hitler" either. I grew up in a place where I know what real extremists do actually look like.
Treating those with different opinions, is brewing the "fascism" we are hearing so much about but aren't going to see, not in this presidential term at least. We need to try actually talking to people more.
But these people are never going to admit they are Trump supporters. If you think you are someone that could they should believe they could have a rational conversation with them, ask yourself if you still believe the "fine people" hoax, and check what Snopes (yes, Snopes) has to say about that hoax before replying here.
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/01/24/us/embassy-us-flag-blm-gay-pride.html https://vanillaos.org/team