hn3333

off topic: this anti facebook stance by some people here on HN is getting ridiculous.. sad this is a comment here that apparently gets upvotes. I would say that if you do not care about Kolibri os just don't comment..

It would be very bad if OS memory usage did not return to flat no?

Let's be realistic.. let's say you are a c++ programmer and want to learn some modern JS framework. I bet you it will literally take less than a week of concentrated study work for you to become better than 80-90% of people working with it. You can get a book on the subject, there's great tutorials, heck, just reading the reference will get you far.

This is true for a lot of stuff on youtube, coursera etc. I believe. It's for people who don't want to get to the destination faster, by reading a few books and doing the exercises in them.

deleted

:)

Well.. it is an anecdotal representation of some bigger cultural change that happened, though, is it not?

Genetics is one thing, but Japan definitely did allow foreign culture into their mix. Just look at the movie "The Last Samurai" to see what I mean. I wonder if it's possible to put out a number for that.

As for my Country, as Europeans we are heavily influenced by Americans, who we completely seem to accept as our cultural leaders. How do the Japanese feel about them though?

Not sure if it applies to engineers, but there's a difference in the job description between defining and implementing. Sometimes someone knows some theory, does some math and is done. And his or her result is passed to another person that implements it. Sometimes it's the same person doing both, but probably less often. Sometimes the implementer grows and starts putting down some ground rules (becomes an architect) or the other way round (for example there because might be more jobs for implementers).

Perhaps another distinction is between trying something and see if it works, and knowing it will work (or won't work) before it's implemented. Then the difference is between knowing from experience and knowing from having studied the theory (and having worked through the proofs).

Afraid so. That reminds me: IIRC in the Dune universe they eventually abandon all technology. I wonder if we're on that track for real.

Bit flips can happen, but regardless if they can get repaired by ECC code or not, the OS is notified, iirc. It will signal a corruption to the process that is mapped to the faulty address. I suppose that if the memory contains code, the process is killed (if ECC correction failed).

The US salary situation is clearly superior. I wish I had somehow made my way into the US after getting my MsC in CS. But some choices led me elsewhere. Anyway, if I did, I'd probably be retired by now.

FWIW: As a dev I've made both contact with Apple and with Google reps and it was like day and night. Apple actually offers support and tries to resolve my problems while Google feels like getting some bureaucracy done at a public office or worse. (Speaking of European bureaucracy, YMMV.)

Good old DOS. If I didn't know Unix I'd miss it!

Does processing power translate to actual power? Will most stock market gains in the end go to the people with the fastest computers? Will wars be won by the groups with the most processing speed? Was Cyberpunk (slightly) wrong and it's just about having more memory and more instructions per millisecond than the rest? Are sophisticated circuits the new oil?

Let's be realistic. The application for bitcoins is buying drugs in the darknet, extortion and money laundering. Not more, not less.

Sorry but isn't this trivial to circumvent. Hire me Facebook. I'll get you the usual data back in a day or so.

EDIT: I am confused why nobody sees the obvious.

I am fascinated by how music was made in the 80s and 90s, all these devices.. but in 2020, whats the benefit of having a such device? Can't a laptop computer replace it all?

Well, we often don't know where our good ideas come from. They kind of bubble up once enough preparation has been put in place I suppose. If we experience a Eureka moment, it's because we have learned some things, perhaps separate things, and then they somehow got connected and.. epiphany!

Perhaps AI, GPT3 or something else, could produce these epiphanies by connecting concepts or bits of data .. but it would also have to realise that some conclusion it has reached is indeed important. How would it do that? I think this the part that currently(?) still requires humans with a history of being human. Of being interested in a subject and being frustrated by certain limitation. Or being curious of why things are a certain way. There's a drive to explore that may lead to some new insights and answers.

Writing is about exploration. And then about discovering these interesting bits that come up unexpectedly, and working with them and developing them.

I believe this is, for now, still a task for humans. And no interesting fiction or non fiction will come from GPT-3 except by accident perhaps. If we get enough monkeys with typewriters..

And if the monkeys are only allowed to read good literature before they start typing...

who knows

Is there some connection to the "Eternal Return"? Perhaps this is a more scientific view of the same idea? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eternal_return

I think the book "Spin Selling" may be worth your time.

I was online and I was programming back then. Why am I not a billionaire?

Thanks, listening to the 1968 album now. Fantastic stuff!

Softbank buys low ($32B in 2016) and sells high ($40B in 2020). Nice trade!

I believe Minidisc was also the medium of choice in "Strange Days", a pretty good and still very relevant movie that gets mentioned rarely for some reason.

Stop giving away great software for free. Sell it! :)

(P.S:: Didn't check out the source code. It's just a general sentiment of mine lately.)

LinkedIn makes communication between users miserable unless you pay. Copyright holders make distribution miserable unless you pay etc.

Not judging any of those as bad, just saying that it's not uncommon for providers of products or services to limit them.

let me finish your summary:

... but the aerodynamics were changed in the process and they fixed it with software, which was bad.

So many possibilities:

This can be used to generate fake flirting on dating sites. (I assume this is already going on, but now they don't need to hire humans to do it.) Or how about flamewar bots to keeps Twitter users busy. Also perhaps it can answer support questions better than current systems. Come to think of it, we might eventually need some sort of proof/signature that something was written by a human being.

Unless all traffic is routed through Apple servers advertisers will still be able to track the ip address.

(A visit to some url, say google.com, with login cookie, and the link between ip and user is made again.)

That's assuming Tweets actually serve an actual diplomatic function and are not merely marketing/propaganda for voters.

(Also POTUS is not authorized to declare any wars btw.)

I like your second paragraph. This is true for large parts of life and a good reason to work hard and leave something behind for future generations.