986 karma · joined October 21, 2014
The people I look for are those that take strong stands but are willing and able to adjust and even quickly reverse those stances.
To me it's the difference between a leader and a worker bee.
And since it is such a frequent occurrence, would that not point to the fact that people do enjoy talking about being down voted?
Edit: case and point
Docker has been actively trying to become to household brand name for containers so it's difficult for me to give them a pass with your line of reasoning.
> Re Persistent Data: You are probably going to have a tough time if you try to do persistent data. Containers really excel at stateless tasks(or temporary state like caching). Certainly it's doable but for someone early in their adoption the proper toe in the water is probably the stateless business logic not the state layer.
I don't really feel like anyone is taking this very seriously.
There are the exceptions of very widely used projects where contributors will only look at the code a couple times when making a change to be pushed upstream or where there are significantly junior developers that need a narrow scope of the language to help them with the learning curve and getting up to speed with the code base.
In my experience(which is very anecdotal I admit), the requirement for consistency is more about a particular personality trait that many developers have - the need for order and control - as opposed to a requirement for quality production code.
I'm not sure I would call my feature "great" if it could have brought down npm.
Think of it more as converting your Level 3 stock into Century Link stock.
2. 5-40% quite a broad range. Who determines this percentage and what percentage does the highest volume quintile pay out?
Absolutely not. I don't think I would look to fill my team with people who wish to be spoken to as children.