13 karma · joined May 4, 2015
First, there was Apple scanning photos to check for child abuse[0] (that obviously got no attention on this site), then there was this one - Apple uploading hashes of all unsigned executables you run.
Do people really accept that company's "privacy" selling point?
[0] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21180019, https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22008855
> We didn't go out of our way to deliberately break anything.
> But we do occasionally turn symbols that aren't meant to be used outside the kernel into GPL-only, because they have some internal implementation issues.
This is not something very easy to fix - not as easy as fixing Cisco devices that hijack 1.1.1.1, or upgrade enterprise-grade MITM firewalls that don't know and block TLS 1.3.
And of course they failed right from the start. From semver.org: Version 1.0.0 defines the public API.
So their jumping to 4.0.0 from 0.x.x means they don't care to have a public API!