1,735 karma · joined January 24, 2013
This is literally the opposite of what is true.
The rate of improvement has slowed down as the low hanging problems have been addressed. Everyone has pushed their timelines out.
It's pretty bad that a research scientist at MIT didn't call him out on this. What's the point in someone who works in the field conducting interviews if he doesn't question the interviewee.
They really shouldn't get the benefit of the doubt. The burden of proof is on the company selling a system to control a two ton vehicle travelling over 70mph.
It's like having a doctor that only accepts completely healthy 20 year old patients quoting their stats compared to the general population.
These cars are no where near being fully autonomous and the story that Elon is paining about this happening in a few years with the sensors in a Tesla and the current state of research is a fantasy. End of the day he's a car salesman so take it with a pinch of salt.
https://www.businessinsider.com/amazon-web-services-cloud-on...
AWS makes all the money, everything else is marginal.
> Amazon Web Services, which accounted for about 89% of Amazon's $1 billion total operating profit this past quarter. That's despite AWS accounting for just 10% of the company's overall revenue during the same time frame.
> But despite all of this, Amazon generates just a fraction of its net earnings from e-commerce. Instead, Amazon's bread and butter is its cloud computing segment, Amazon Web Services (AWS).
https://www.businessinsider.com/amazon-web-services-cloud-on...
AWS makes all the money, everything else is marginal.
> Amazon Web Services, which accounted for about 89% of Amazon's $1 billion total operating profit this past quarter. That's despite AWS accounting for just 10% of the company's overall revenue during the same time frame.
> But despite all of this, Amazon generates just a fraction of its net earnings from e-commerce. Instead, Amazon's bread and butter is its cloud computing segment, Amazon Web Services (AWS).
Seems to completely work around the reasons why Bitcoin etc. were interesting in the first place as a technology.
This seems to be the "alt" case and is dismissed by the author but would like to hear a fuller explaination of why this is a problem?
To the people complaining about the possibility of a government run site being poor have you used TurboTax? I've used it twice now and will never use it again. The dark patterns, upselling and fake loading screens really obscured how simple my taxes actually were to do.
"Scots mayor" in this cases refers to an individual and just seems a little off. Happy to be corrected :) also not a big deal either way as the writer is German.
Never heard "Scots" used as an acceptable, non-plural, abreviation of Scottish.
I could compare all companies to the worst examples too (e.g. all startups are Theranos) but that would never be taken seriously nor would it be fair yet somehow with unions that level of analysis is taken seriously.
Companies have spent a lot of time and money spreading this message so it's not suprising but it seems like a default position of many tech workers I've met in the Bay Area while they also grumble about many aspects of their job.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iterative_closest_point
This alone isn't SLAM but can be used for odometry as part of a SLAM system.
Tesla is the one making the big claims and drawing attention to themselves. How many others are claiming full autonomy is just around the corner? They bring the publicly on themselves and can't have it both ways.
https://electrek.co/2019/03/29/tesla-full-self-driving-compu...
https://www.wired.com/story/cadillac-super-cruise-ct6-lidar-...
https://www.cadillac.com/world-of-cadillac/innovation/super-...