hateduser2

Sorry but his was just a bad article. I like it for generating discussion about the topic but it’s contents were without insight and seemed mostly just to promote the author. Made me lose most or all respect for them instead.

To the extent that the science says it is one way (and it’s legitimate science and you interpreted it correctly), I take your view. I still find it totally ybsatisfting as far as actually understanding the source of stress and dealing with it in a healthy and long term way.

Thanks for the jab. Makes me hate you a little.

Yours doesn’t discuss the timing or police raids, so it’s not as simple as saying the OP is a spin.

That depends on their target audience actually. It’s not objective like you phrased it.

Mindfulness strikes me as total BS pandering to westerners obsession and reverence for Buddhism and some orientalist kind of ideas.

Don’t kid yourself and buy into all the marketing.

Was it unclear? That these are conclusions from evidence not built in popular assumptions. I don’t believe these things by training and for a long time I didn’t believe them. I’ve grown to believe themninstead.

Why do you call those things assumptions? That says more about you than the people you claim are assuming these things.

Front end dev is utilitarian. Learning is not 0 cost.

Is your second ~~sentence~~ paragraph a self contradiction? Anyways it’s not very humble.

I like that for myself but how can you say that is good?

Is it Aggro? I took his comment as a criticism of the author for being playful, and I’d rather the author not get criticism for that.

You can probably just ignore that right?

I like the idea but Rust has so many issues in front of it I’m not sure it has the energy to invest in something like hay.

The head is the larger whole just not physically. Conceptually.

If any can be wrong about their feelings then so can millions. I don’t find your argument by popularity convincing, and I’m annoyed this whole time that you decided to attack me than even consider my point.

Is there something to their feeling? Yes. Is it how they say it is? I don’t think so.

But that wasn’t the only fact I used, that’s secondary. Also give me a break with the empathy shtick.

If people can be wrong about their feelings then that seems like good evidence, save for some biological disorder, yes. I suppose you’re saying I can’t make this argument unless I’m a master meditator? And what if I don’t believe in meditation the way you do?

How is that a vague half truth? Just because it’s not concrete doesn’t mean it’s either vague or only half true

Are there wrong povs? Your comment addresses nothing specific about mine.

This can be used to rePly to any comment anywhere.

What’s wrong with you

I find t hard to believe anyone genuinely doesn’t want to. I suggest they’re wrong about their feelings. They only exist because every ancestor of theirs has children. Every person who exists today shares that quality. It seems like a critical part of life to have kids or a kid at least.

Why would you think this isn’t a socially acceptable POV? I’ve never heard it before and it doesn’t come across as noxious to me.

Vim and sublime aren’t their competitor while vs code is.

That’s a pretty big gap

The act that you don’t see the value in charisma says nothin about whether or not it should trump productivity. I think it’s highly reasonable that it would and maybe obvious that it should.

Rosted

I’ve seen this.

It badfles me that technologists commonly complain about new technology. As far as I can tell your complaint boils down to “people should stop making and switching to new things”.. I find it hard to understand why someone with this attitude would be a technologist of any kind, and I find the attitude really obnoxious.

Why assume they’ve already seen it? They probably just haven’t