hanszarkov

Tried this, no joy. I created a CORE API key from my workspace->API page, configured MCP with Claude Desktop, I get this: "You didn't provide an API key...You can obtain an API key from https://platform.openai.com/account/api-keys"

Other memory MCP servers do not require access to OpenAI - and not even sure why I would want any of my data going there when I use a paid Claude subscription.

I like the idea here, but doesn't seem very usable.

Does this work with Claude?

Tesla makes great products.

Fascinating read. Never knew about these 'aggregate' organisms.

But what I do have are a very particular set of skills, skills I have acquired over a very long career. Skills that make me a nightmare for people like you

I have experienced the same thing 100 plus times

Framemaker was great, was the tool used by most US military contractors in 90s. Many well known aircraft were designed using this document tool. I still try to configure MS Word to work like it.

>The world probably has never been as peaceful as in the last 50 years or so.

Peaceful? As in Russia, Ukraine, Israel, Gaza, Iran? Brazil is at great risk also.

I don't think so.

I like the show so far. I did read the books several times because they are incredible.

I think its better for people to think of this (or any film based on other media) as someone's adaptation. I wonder if the expectations for such endeavors are high because of how good Jackson was with LoTR - surely an epic story and films, but this is just a TV series. Some of these imdb comments are funny, like the one that likens this show to the Friends TV series - only set in Oxford. Probably because the portrayal of the group of scientists is more social than science, but that is just a reflection of the time we live in.

So not without thorns, but if you are a fan of the books this is a fun watch.

Perhaps based on land rovers...

This

While I agree with most of the ideas here, the statement of "...than a gas-guzzling H3" is just sensational.

Sure the Hummer line in general was not good on gas, but most folks, including these folks don't know that most H3 units were sold with 5 cylinder engines (GM's inline-5 Vortec), and get reasonable fuel economy _for a truck_.

This 100%, I have a similar experience.

Concur, Jetty has been faster than Tomcat in my experience. Undertow seems even faster in my testing.

This isn't factual, Spring and Boot have been 100% annotation configurable for almost a decade. The Spring documentation I read has zero XML.

yes, also add cryptographic complexity, don't think that qualifies either.

I've used the BSON Java ObjectId for distributed primary key generation for a long time. Really useful for distributed systems.

with full spy mode!

I'm one engineer that won't be buying a Mazda

you've never seen remote X, it was a decade ahead of RDP

False, I've done remote XDMCP in the early 2000s and it worked well on dial up.

Sick people

This.

> You can't cover up your crimes by arresting the criminal you > did the crimes with and then saying he's got no credibility > because he's a criminal.

Yep, 100%

None of these are unique to San Francisco

dogs, camping out-at-home, and sledding with kids, baseball/catch. I practice my golf swing in the summer, family fun

Part of the Motorcycle Safey Foundation (MSF) curriculum since at least the 1990s: "push left go left, push right go right"

That book by Leslie Keane is honest journalism, a fair treatment, I liked it.

You misunderstood - its the "ratio of people talking" that is poor

Funny stuff here, this is a long & opinionated rant against null or undefined pointer references in favor of functional. Little to do with functional programming - aside from how it handles this same construct.

> you can’t have a resistor shared by, say, both the keyboard > and the monitor’s circuitry. But programmers do this kind of > sharing all the time in their software. It’s called shared global state

Not it isn't - this is called reuse, in modern OOA&D its either inheritance or polymorphic composition. Some more modern approaches use 'mixins' and age old cross-cuts.

> Another complexity monster lurking in the software quagmire is called > a null reference, meaning that a reference to a place in memory points > to nothing at all

I recall my earliest days, using a microtec ICE to step through my code on an i960 on board and plugged into a DEC Alpha PCI slot, when the instruction pointer went to a place where there wasn't any instructions - I called it 'hyperspace' so yeah computers can actually execute bad code when I write bad code... omg - WRITE BETTER CODE, don't be constrained by the language!

>software industry has eliminated GOTO from modern higher-level languages, >software nevertheless continues to grow in complexity and fragility.

Seriously, did Scalfini quote 1970 BASIC GOTO? what about :<ref> ?

> Instead, there is a construct usually called Maybe (or Option in some languages)

Perhaps, maybe 8 years ago there was java.util.Optional ?

> founded in 1982 with a mission to help government agencies leverage technology

I think this explains some motivation

>Functional programming has a steep learning curve

Maybe for some, not for experienced practitioners, which I'd argue if you need to learn it perhaps you already have some computer science in your background - then not so steep.

I love functional approaches, don't get me wrong here, just don't appreciate rants so slanted and based in bias without real roots.