988 karma · joined March 29, 2022
I admit it’s not great data, but I think it’s a step better than drawing conclusions from a single event.
Similarly, if you’d like to understand why people put up with Apple’s moderate abuse, maybe ask not how one might write them off as insane, but instead what their alternatives are.
- In addition to not supporting EDNS, Cloudflare sends DNS requests from effectively random PoPs, so the recipient doesn’t know even the visitor’s nationality.
- The reason archive.is doesn’t like this is it makes them vulnerable to DoS attack.
Source and details: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36971650
I think the real solution to future breaches is ephemerality, which is why it’s critical for any secure messaging service to not only implement all-participant auto-delete, but to also make it easy to opt in to only for specific messages, since that brings the cost:benefit down to a point that it’s actually used.
Hardware-only is the right move IMO. Literally earlier today I was dealing with stuttering video that turned out to be caused by Chrome putting me on a software implementation of a “better” codec. These new codecs are only better on devices that can run them without stuttering, heating up, and chewing through battery.
[1]: https://webkit.org/blog/14445/webkit-features-in-safari-17-0...
Everybody with a clue knows LastPass is a lost cause, but what’s more interesting to me is how we can generalize the lessons we’re learning here. I’d propose that user blaming in general is evidence of bad tech and magical thinking around it, and that points a finger at some very interesting targets.
That’s not true, this new system is a tracker, not tracking protection. Simply turning it off improves privacy.
Cynically, this looks like a PR strategy: “Our course corrections are always about us improving on our past selves, not anybody else knowing better than us.”
I wonder, though, if it either really took them this long to reimplement it, or this long for some political change to enable it, and meanwhile a disconnected PR department was just spinning whatever they had at the time.
256 - own domain, original tld
208 - .com
29 - .net
19 - .org
95 - own domain, cctld
38 - other, <5 each
20 - .io
19 - .me
9 - .ca
9 - .in
85 - own domain, new tld
41 - other, <5 each
31 - .dev
7 - .blog
6 - .xyz
73 - platform’s domain
36 - .substack.com
20 - .github.io
9 - .medium.com
8 - otherA: You say “Z is true of X”, and I respond “Z is false for thing-like-X”, implying “Z is likely false for X”.
B: You say “Z is true”, and I respond “Z is false for Y”, implying not “Y is like X therefore Z is likely false”, but “Z is sometimes false, so we need to actually evaluate whether it’s true of X”.
I think people who use this reasoning would do well to make it more explicit.
(Here, Z is “there must be a path to compliance”, X is Coinbase, and Y – not, I believe, thing-like-X – is heroin.)
It looks like Intel still has a solid lead in single core perf, which is frankly the biggest factor for me for a general purpose desktop CPU. Of course, other uses have other priorities. The charts are missing one important measure, power efficiency.